a thread that was trolled badly

[P7PSP]

You can't just be avoidant of everything slightly uncertain socially, that's not very healthy or functional. It is also why you can't really argue that someone generally impaired "should have well know of X" in retrospective, because he probably knows everything but never anything well.

Actually I can and do argue that you protesting that you did not understand why Rage was perturbed about you asking DFG for nudes smells like bullshit.

Do you routinely step into traffic without looking down the street both ways?
Do you routinely touch hot stoves?
Just how befuddled are you in day to day life Princess?


How about answering these questions? Let's plumb the depths of your day to day stupidity Princess.

[Al Swearegen]

Oh I think there is a pretty reasonable chance that it is not everyone else except for Duckfetishgirl who is wrong.
I think that there is also a pretty good chance that not thrashing out every conclusion with you, DFGL, is not akin to not having thought about it. As much as what you would make grand assumptions on.
I think everyone has you pegged because you are so like what has come before and no doubt will again. You are far from unique or special

[神]

@Cassanova Frankenstein:
I know you are trolling me with retarded logic, but I am responding to this anyway.

What I do understand is that Rage was being protective of DuckFetishGirl, because he felt threatened by my interest (which became more explicit when asking about nudes) in her. I do know that this can happen, also for all other sorts of reasons, but given the circumstances I judged it to be improbable. I expected him if then to be annoyed for me being indiscreet and dismiss the question. I knew there was a higher probability of a negative response than there was of a neutral or positive response. But I valued my interest in DuckFetishGirl higher than the possible effective negative impact (which is annoying someone with a question he doesn't want to hear).

"Do you do X that is not the same and makes up for a bad analogy?"
Probably not.

That which I act upon in everyday life is extremely rational and pragmatical.

[P7PSP]

@Cassanova Frankenstein:
I know you are trolling me with retarded logic, but I am responding to this anyway.

What I do understand is that Rage was being protective of DuckFetishGirl, because he felt threatened by my interest (which became more explicit when asking about nudes) in her. I do know that this can happen, also for all other sorts of reasons, but given the circumstances I judged it to be improbable. I expected him if then to be annoyed for me being indiscreet and dismiss the question. I knew there was a higher probability of a negative response than there was of a neutral or positive response. But I valued my interest in DuckFetishGirl higher than the possible effective negative impact (which is annoying someone with a question he doesn't want to hear).

"Do you do X that is not the same and makes up for a bad analogy?"
Probably not.

That which I act upon in everyday life is extremely rational and pragmatical.

So your befuddledness is just another affectation. So much for the I'm asspie and don't know better defense. 

[神]

Oh I think there is a pretty reasonable chance that it is not everyone else except for Duckfetishgirl who is wrong.
I think that there is also a pretty good chance that not thrashing out every conclusion with you, DFGL, is not akin to not having thought about it. As much as what you would make grand assumptions on.
I think everyone has you pegged because you are so like what has come before and no doubt will again. You are far from unique or special

Firstly, there are only few people participating in the posts relating to me and there is a very strong group mentality here. No matter if it is me or not, the chances in such a situation that one person got a better grasp on the circumstances are not considerably lower if compared to the opposite. I can of course not know how much you actually read or understood, I was like I said just judging from what I can know. And much wasn't exclusively directed at you.

You don't know me. The one that can draw the best conclusions about a person themselves is the person themselves. Differences in people relevant to social interaction and to them as a person are huge. You put it as if it needs 10 posts from someone to know what he is all about. That is again just extremely superficial.

[Al Swearegen]

@Cassanova Frankenstein:
I know you are trolling me with retarded logic, but I am responding to this anyway.

What I do understand is that Rage was being protective of DuckFetishGirl, because he felt threatened by my interest (which became more explicit when asking about nudes) in her. I do know that this can happen, also for all other sorts of reasons, but given the circumstances I judged it to be improbable. I expected him if then to be annoyed for me being indiscreet and dismiss the question. I knew there was a higher probability of a negative response than there was of a neutral or positive response. But I valued my interest in DuckFetishGirl higher than the possible effective negative impact (which is annoying someone with a question he doesn't want to hear).

"Do you do X that is not the same and makes up for a bad analogy?"
Probably not.

That which I act upon in everyday life is extremely rational and pragmatical.

Noooooo......you were acting like a creep around his girlfriend. That does not make HIM insecure does it?



DFGL = Army of one. (He's driving fine - He tells us this)

[Gopher Gary]

Firstly, there are only few people participating in the posts relating to me 

Yeah, everyone else is just completely ignoring you, troll. 

[Gopher Gary]

@Scary_Gary: I ignore you because you are like the manifestation of useless randomness and there is no basis of communication.

@Troll: I fixate on you because I want to see your PP.

[神]

There you go.

[TheoK]

Pretty average. Not circumcised. Well, well 

[Gopher Gary]

There you go.

OMG!!    I can't believe you really did it!!     You're so awesome!!  Even if you decide to leave, you'll always rank among the bravest of the brave @Intensity². 

Don't you feel better now, man?  That's all you need to do, just relax a little. Stop fighting what this place is. Stop fighting your place in it. Get a real name and be a real member. 

[神]

I have no issues with showing my penis and I wanted to do a duel of penis size comparison with Rage before. But he was afraid of getting involved with homosexuality for some reason.

[Gopher Gary]

No worries, n00b. I'm not a homophobe. 

[Gopher Gary]

So are you sticking with the creepy username? If so, I'm naming you Puke. 

[神]

My username is not creepy but descriptive, like DuckFetishGirl is. I love DuckFetishGirl, but I am not infatuated with her or otherwise neuro-chemically impaired.