Ignoring Rage, let me take something apart here.
Let's make clear some facts about communication first. I think we must all agree that there are:
1. the different perceived realities of people
2. the message of each person he wants to communicate about those realities
3. the conclusions we draw about the messages we individually perceived
4. the decisions we make based on the understanding we gained by that
Fast-forward.......this kind of bullshit you spout, we have seen before. It is not new and you are not special or unique or different to this kind of discourse.
Your problem here is that you categorize what I write as bullshit prior to any coherent interpretation of the content. The category itself is
your reality and argument to justify ignorance and not the content on which you base your categorization on.
We categorise because it is the same.
The problem is not that you categorize in order to express yourself or in order to order thought processes. The problem I see is that you have made the categories your reality and abandoned the reality the categories are supposed to be descriptive of. Essentially that is just being extremely superficial.
We say you post like Buttcoffee because you post like Buttcoffee.
How is that even relevant to anything. Why mention it in excess? Is it actually supposed to be some kind of argument, or just random facts about this forum? The only logic you can put that into considering your whole posts would be something like "Buttcoffee was just posting incoherent shit, therefore anyone posting like Buttcoffee is talking shit.". You see how that makes no sense and how it is irrelevant?
Now this type of pseudo-intellectualising sounds very much like the kind of asshattery that Buttcoffee used to try. He was a loser and intellectual lightweight of cringeworthy stature. I think you would have got on well with him and his emotional attention whoring drug-addled girlfriend, Eris.
We call it pseudo-intellectualising because it is bereft of actual intellect and does a poor imitation of putting across your ideas.
Again, you argue based on categorization, if you can call it an argument (which would be all about justifying your dismissal of any proper conversation and discussion ..). The fact is, you got the impression that my posts are stupid, but you do not name why and how or anything that would justify your opinion. Instead you talk about Buttcoffee. Hopefully not implying the "A sounds about like B, therefore A is effectively B" logic I previously mentioned... Pseudo-intellectualising is again derogatory, like much of the crap used here to insult people.
All you seem to do here is to justify one derogatory stereotype and insult with another. I begin to doubt that you are able to argue anything logically coherent anymore, that is actually based on an honest perception of reality, instead of superficial categories and simplifying ideas.
I drew a picture to illustrate your problem.