Most of what he saying is right, but he's tacking it to feminists rather than it's radicals. He is confusing feminism, which is really just an outdated name for "gender equality" these days, for radical man-hating feminism. Changing feminism's name to reflect the fact it's really just about gender equality (ie. something less wordy than "gender egalitarianism") will differentiate it from the radical side of it.
You'll get radicals in any religion or ideology. Rage fails to see that. He's a bit of a radical of his own views anyway, and seems to come off as a stereotypical posterchild of right-wing libertarianism mixed with paranoia. (cue posts of BACK YER SHIT UP despite most of his recent posts proving it)
Nope. You are well meaning enough Shleed but I don't know who sold you this ideology.
Feminism is not about gender equality and is not a different name for gender equality. Feminism is for females. They are the end recipients. If males get ANY benefit, it is not by design.
We do not have to look to radical feminist ideas.
Society actively seeks to further women ahead of men in an attempt to "bring them up to par" This is the theory. In practice whilst they strived for housing for women to tackle women who are victims of domestic violence, where are the men's shelters? What about the difference in prison sentencing? What about the Child Support laws? What about the men's rights movements? What about the difference in male and female educational standards at school? What about Paternity/Maternity leave differences? What about the misinformation about me and women pay gaps?
Why is there so much information difference in so many areas where woman are NOT on par but quite obviously all over the blokes, YET still the push for "more equality" in these areas?
Why are feminists not supporting the men's movement? Why are feminists not supporting men's housing....oh well ask Erin Pizzey what happens if you try to assert that men need shelters.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_PizzeySociety has been dictated to by feminists and not just hardline radicals and a lot of the presumptions are based on bullshit, nothing more than feelings or fears or wants. a lot of the fearmongering is as successful as the fearmongering about terrorists after 9/11 (years after) and just as successful in thinking that society has to give up rights or change their views for their own good over a lot of things that they possibly ought not.