It's going to be awkward. If Mr and Mrs Burr ever lose their son Tim in the forest.
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: odeon on August 29, 2013, 11:15:54 PMQuote from: bodie on August 19, 2013, 03:50:47 AMQuote from: odeon on August 18, 2013, 10:59:01 PMQuote from: Adam on August 18, 2013, 06:17:18 PMQuote from: sg1008 on August 18, 2013, 05:25:28 PMQuote from: Jack on August 18, 2013, 02:13:21 PMQuote from: Adam on August 18, 2013, 02:04:18 PMI got 17, although as others have said, it's very unlikely to be accurate )whther I estimated too low or two high, or details about each thing)I found it interesting though, and for the people complaining about it not being accurate etc - i'm sure it's mainly about raising awareness and getting you to THINK about what you buy/use. Not about being a technically correct analyisisThen it should be called, 'How many slaves could possibly work for you?', raising awareness with technically incorrect analysis and all.I really don't think the NUMBER of slaves was the point. I think the point is raise awareness about the prevelance of slavery int he production of items ppl use everyday or might take for granted. For those of you who actually finished the survey, you would have found a map of areas where slavery is prevalent, what items typically come from there. The point of the site was to personalize your link with slave labour used to manufacture, or extract materials, because we tend to feel removed from such things. Hence why they had the little chain-links showing how you connect to enslaved people.And I didn't feel it was guilt tripping at all. I was genuinely interested in the prevalence of slaves and they provided good, easy to read information for further research. Exactly. That was the point of it. Not so people could find out exactly what number of slaves they're benefiting from. That would be impossible, obviously.All sites and campaigns need a catchy name. "How many slaves work for you?" is designed to get people to click on itThe questions are designed to get people to THINK ABOUT all the different products they use that might derive from forced labour etcTHe results aren't really what it's aboutMany awareness-raisning campaigns use stuff like this. It's not unusual and it's not about giving you a precise number. I think it also made that clear throughout the test and at the end (it said plenty of times that they were working on assumptions, and gave you the option to make it more specific)It's about getting the attention of people who wouldn't necessarily have clicked on a link and read through an article about itI don't see what the fuss is all about (the fuss about it not being correct I mean, not the fuss about slavery lol)If you want my attention, focus on the facts. It's one thing focussing on assumptions and another to lie. They have obviously put some effort into the site but it feels as if their main focus was on design, not to get their numbers right.Unfortunately the same is true for many other awareness sites.But it got your attention anyway. Enough of it to be discussing it now. Nobody even posted in this thread until now. Ten days later. Just sayin'. I think something happened...Anal Fisting or something...
Quote from: bodie on August 19, 2013, 03:50:47 AMQuote from: odeon on August 18, 2013, 10:59:01 PMQuote from: Adam on August 18, 2013, 06:17:18 PMQuote from: sg1008 on August 18, 2013, 05:25:28 PMQuote from: Jack on August 18, 2013, 02:13:21 PMQuote from: Adam on August 18, 2013, 02:04:18 PMI got 17, although as others have said, it's very unlikely to be accurate )whther I estimated too low or two high, or details about each thing)I found it interesting though, and for the people complaining about it not being accurate etc - i'm sure it's mainly about raising awareness and getting you to THINK about what you buy/use. Not about being a technically correct analyisisThen it should be called, 'How many slaves could possibly work for you?', raising awareness with technically incorrect analysis and all.I really don't think the NUMBER of slaves was the point. I think the point is raise awareness about the prevelance of slavery int he production of items ppl use everyday or might take for granted. For those of you who actually finished the survey, you would have found a map of areas where slavery is prevalent, what items typically come from there. The point of the site was to personalize your link with slave labour used to manufacture, or extract materials, because we tend to feel removed from such things. Hence why they had the little chain-links showing how you connect to enslaved people.And I didn't feel it was guilt tripping at all. I was genuinely interested in the prevalence of slaves and they provided good, easy to read information for further research. Exactly. That was the point of it. Not so people could find out exactly what number of slaves they're benefiting from. That would be impossible, obviously.All sites and campaigns need a catchy name. "How many slaves work for you?" is designed to get people to click on itThe questions are designed to get people to THINK ABOUT all the different products they use that might derive from forced labour etcTHe results aren't really what it's aboutMany awareness-raisning campaigns use stuff like this. It's not unusual and it's not about giving you a precise number. I think it also made that clear throughout the test and at the end (it said plenty of times that they were working on assumptions, and gave you the option to make it more specific)It's about getting the attention of people who wouldn't necessarily have clicked on a link and read through an article about itI don't see what the fuss is all about (the fuss about it not being correct I mean, not the fuss about slavery lol)If you want my attention, focus on the facts. It's one thing focussing on assumptions and another to lie. They have obviously put some effort into the site but it feels as if their main focus was on design, not to get their numbers right.Unfortunately the same is true for many other awareness sites.But it got your attention anyway. Enough of it to be discussing it now. Nobody even posted in this thread until now. Ten days later. Just sayin'.
Quote from: odeon on August 18, 2013, 10:59:01 PMQuote from: Adam on August 18, 2013, 06:17:18 PMQuote from: sg1008 on August 18, 2013, 05:25:28 PMQuote from: Jack on August 18, 2013, 02:13:21 PMQuote from: Adam on August 18, 2013, 02:04:18 PMI got 17, although as others have said, it's very unlikely to be accurate )whther I estimated too low or two high, or details about each thing)I found it interesting though, and for the people complaining about it not being accurate etc - i'm sure it's mainly about raising awareness and getting you to THINK about what you buy/use. Not about being a technically correct analyisisThen it should be called, 'How many slaves could possibly work for you?', raising awareness with technically incorrect analysis and all.I really don't think the NUMBER of slaves was the point. I think the point is raise awareness about the prevelance of slavery int he production of items ppl use everyday or might take for granted. For those of you who actually finished the survey, you would have found a map of areas where slavery is prevalent, what items typically come from there. The point of the site was to personalize your link with slave labour used to manufacture, or extract materials, because we tend to feel removed from such things. Hence why they had the little chain-links showing how you connect to enslaved people.And I didn't feel it was guilt tripping at all. I was genuinely interested in the prevalence of slaves and they provided good, easy to read information for further research. Exactly. That was the point of it. Not so people could find out exactly what number of slaves they're benefiting from. That would be impossible, obviously.All sites and campaigns need a catchy name. "How many slaves work for you?" is designed to get people to click on itThe questions are designed to get people to THINK ABOUT all the different products they use that might derive from forced labour etcTHe results aren't really what it's aboutMany awareness-raisning campaigns use stuff like this. It's not unusual and it's not about giving you a precise number. I think it also made that clear throughout the test and at the end (it said plenty of times that they were working on assumptions, and gave you the option to make it more specific)It's about getting the attention of people who wouldn't necessarily have clicked on a link and read through an article about itI don't see what the fuss is all about (the fuss about it not being correct I mean, not the fuss about slavery lol)If you want my attention, focus on the facts. It's one thing focussing on assumptions and another to lie. They have obviously put some effort into the site but it feels as if their main focus was on design, not to get their numbers right.Unfortunately the same is true for many other awareness sites.But it got your attention anyway. Enough of it to be discussing it now.
Quote from: Adam on August 18, 2013, 06:17:18 PMQuote from: sg1008 on August 18, 2013, 05:25:28 PMQuote from: Jack on August 18, 2013, 02:13:21 PMQuote from: Adam on August 18, 2013, 02:04:18 PMI got 17, although as others have said, it's very unlikely to be accurate )whther I estimated too low or two high, or details about each thing)I found it interesting though, and for the people complaining about it not being accurate etc - i'm sure it's mainly about raising awareness and getting you to THINK about what you buy/use. Not about being a technically correct analyisisThen it should be called, 'How many slaves could possibly work for you?', raising awareness with technically incorrect analysis and all.I really don't think the NUMBER of slaves was the point. I think the point is raise awareness about the prevelance of slavery int he production of items ppl use everyday or might take for granted. For those of you who actually finished the survey, you would have found a map of areas where slavery is prevalent, what items typically come from there. The point of the site was to personalize your link with slave labour used to manufacture, or extract materials, because we tend to feel removed from such things. Hence why they had the little chain-links showing how you connect to enslaved people.And I didn't feel it was guilt tripping at all. I was genuinely interested in the prevalence of slaves and they provided good, easy to read information for further research. Exactly. That was the point of it. Not so people could find out exactly what number of slaves they're benefiting from. That would be impossible, obviously.All sites and campaigns need a catchy name. "How many slaves work for you?" is designed to get people to click on itThe questions are designed to get people to THINK ABOUT all the different products they use that might derive from forced labour etcTHe results aren't really what it's aboutMany awareness-raisning campaigns use stuff like this. It's not unusual and it's not about giving you a precise number. I think it also made that clear throughout the test and at the end (it said plenty of times that they were working on assumptions, and gave you the option to make it more specific)It's about getting the attention of people who wouldn't necessarily have clicked on a link and read through an article about itI don't see what the fuss is all about (the fuss about it not being correct I mean, not the fuss about slavery lol)If you want my attention, focus on the facts. It's one thing focussing on assumptions and another to lie. They have obviously put some effort into the site but it feels as if their main focus was on design, not to get their numbers right.Unfortunately the same is true for many other awareness sites.
Quote from: sg1008 on August 18, 2013, 05:25:28 PMQuote from: Jack on August 18, 2013, 02:13:21 PMQuote from: Adam on August 18, 2013, 02:04:18 PMI got 17, although as others have said, it's very unlikely to be accurate )whther I estimated too low or two high, or details about each thing)I found it interesting though, and for the people complaining about it not being accurate etc - i'm sure it's mainly about raising awareness and getting you to THINK about what you buy/use. Not about being a technically correct analyisisThen it should be called, 'How many slaves could possibly work for you?', raising awareness with technically incorrect analysis and all.I really don't think the NUMBER of slaves was the point. I think the point is raise awareness about the prevelance of slavery int he production of items ppl use everyday or might take for granted. For those of you who actually finished the survey, you would have found a map of areas where slavery is prevalent, what items typically come from there. The point of the site was to personalize your link with slave labour used to manufacture, or extract materials, because we tend to feel removed from such things. Hence why they had the little chain-links showing how you connect to enslaved people.And I didn't feel it was guilt tripping at all. I was genuinely interested in the prevalence of slaves and they provided good, easy to read information for further research. Exactly. That was the point of it. Not so people could find out exactly what number of slaves they're benefiting from. That would be impossible, obviously.All sites and campaigns need a catchy name. "How many slaves work for you?" is designed to get people to click on itThe questions are designed to get people to THINK ABOUT all the different products they use that might derive from forced labour etcTHe results aren't really what it's aboutMany awareness-raisning campaigns use stuff like this. It's not unusual and it's not about giving you a precise number. I think it also made that clear throughout the test and at the end (it said plenty of times that they were working on assumptions, and gave you the option to make it more specific)It's about getting the attention of people who wouldn't necessarily have clicked on a link and read through an article about itI don't see what the fuss is all about (the fuss about it not being correct I mean, not the fuss about slavery lol)
Quote from: Jack on August 18, 2013, 02:13:21 PMQuote from: Adam on August 18, 2013, 02:04:18 PMI got 17, although as others have said, it's very unlikely to be accurate )whther I estimated too low or two high, or details about each thing)I found it interesting though, and for the people complaining about it not being accurate etc - i'm sure it's mainly about raising awareness and getting you to THINK about what you buy/use. Not about being a technically correct analyisisThen it should be called, 'How many slaves could possibly work for you?', raising awareness with technically incorrect analysis and all.I really don't think the NUMBER of slaves was the point. I think the point is raise awareness about the prevelance of slavery int he production of items ppl use everyday or might take for granted. For those of you who actually finished the survey, you would have found a map of areas where slavery is prevalent, what items typically come from there. The point of the site was to personalize your link with slave labour used to manufacture, or extract materials, because we tend to feel removed from such things. Hence why they had the little chain-links showing how you connect to enslaved people.And I didn't feel it was guilt tripping at all. I was genuinely interested in the prevalence of slaves and they provided good, easy to read information for further research.
Quote from: Adam on August 18, 2013, 02:04:18 PMI got 17, although as others have said, it's very unlikely to be accurate )whther I estimated too low or two high, or details about each thing)I found it interesting though, and for the people complaining about it not being accurate etc - i'm sure it's mainly about raising awareness and getting you to THINK about what you buy/use. Not about being a technically correct analyisisThen it should be called, 'How many slaves could possibly work for you?', raising awareness with technically incorrect analysis and all.
I got 17, although as others have said, it's very unlikely to be accurate )whther I estimated too low or two high, or details about each thing)I found it interesting though, and for the people complaining about it not being accurate etc - i'm sure it's mainly about raising awareness and getting you to THINK about what you buy/use. Not about being a technically correct analyisis
I was just wondering where I can pick up a few of my slaves, I have a lot to get done and am feeling rather lazy today
Jesus died on the cross to show us that BDSM is a legitimate form of love.
There is only one truth and it is that people do have penises of different sizes and one of them is the longest.
The ones that didn't die from overwork or lack of work (that is, not working)
Quote from: sg1008 on December 08, 2014, 12:31:27 AMCan't you guys even just imagine it?Forget practicality, or your experience....can you just....imagine?It's there. It always was.
Can't you guys even just imagine it?Forget practicality, or your experience....can you just....imagine?
