Quick Gareth!!! Someone is talking shit about AFF and Amy!

[Jack]

They are trying to keep each other at arm's length.

When they take up arms is the time to start worrying.

[Semicolon]

They are trying to keep each other at arm's length.

When they take up arms is the time to start worrying.

I'm going to leg it out of here, before Odeon czechs up some puns.

[Jack]

They are trying to keep each other at arm's length.

When they take up arms is the time to start worrying.

I'm going to leg it out of here, before Odeon czechs up some puns.

Battling Odeon with puns? You don't have a leg to stand on.

[BlueGriffyn]

Or maybe it is just that you are hurt and lash out, and everybody who dares to take an even slightly opposing view is the enemy and in liaison with Amy and Gareth.

A groundless accusation. Thus far, I have been the only person to post a thread inviting Gareth to have a civil conversation about what went on. It can clearly be seen that I have allowed Gareth to express his views more than anyone else from AFF. I also apologised to him over the stalker/Spectrum Fairness issue, which brings me to my next point...

Yet you ghey me over an opposing view, clearly angry. Yeah, right.

Wrong again sir. I gheyed you because your post seemed to imply that someone had deliberately asked Gareth's stalker to go after him, which is not the case.

However, I see now that you only saw the Facebook post and not his response on I^2 at the time of posting, so I suppose I'll just let this go.

[Jack]

Seem over now. It's probably best for everyone to wash their hands of the whole thing.

[Semicolon]

Or maybe it is just that you are hurt and lash out, and everybody who dares to take an even slightly opposing view is the enemy and in liaison with Amy and Gareth.

A groundless accusation. Thus far, I have been the only person to post a thread inviting Gareth to have a civil conversation about what went on. It can clearly be seen that I have allowed Gareth to express his views more than anyone else from AFF. I also apologised to him over the stalker/Spectrum Fairness issue, which brings me to my next point...

Yet you ghey me over an opposing view, clearly angry. Yeah, right.

Wrong again sir. I gheyed you because your post seemed to imply that someone had deliberately asked Gareth's stalker to go after him, which is not the case.

However, I see now that you only saw the Facebook post and not his response on I^2 at the time of posting, so I suppose I'll just let this go.

Why did you owe Gareth an apology?

Seem over now. It's probably best for everyone to wash their hands of the whole thing.

But if we do that, we'll have to find drama elsewhere.

[Al Swearegen]

Anyone got the slightest idea why they fall over themselves to keep telling everyone that the site is not for sale? Does anyone care? Did anyone ask to buy it? Did Gareth withdraw such an offer? They seem to keep insisting the point like it was meaningful. It is as meaningful as them telling us that they don't live in Frace and then keep stressing that point. Begs the answer "so fucking what?"

[Gopher Gary]

Go for the money, Gareth.   

[BlueGriffyn]

Or maybe it is just that you are hurt and lash out, and everybody who dares to take an even slightly opposing view is the enemy and in liaison with Amy and Gareth.

A groundless accusation. Thus far, I have been the only person to post a thread inviting Gareth to have a civil conversation about what went on. It can clearly be seen that I have allowed Gareth to express his views more than anyone else from AFF. I also apologised to him over the stalker/Spectrum Fairness issue, which brings me to my next point...

Yet you ghey me over an opposing view, clearly angry. Yeah, right.

Wrong again sir. I gheyed you because your post seemed to imply that someone had deliberately asked Gareth's stalker to go after him, which is not the case.

However, I see now that you only saw the Facebook post and not his response on I^2 at the time of posting, so I suppose I'll just let this go.

Why did you owe Gareth an apology?

I still think he's an asshole for everything he's done, but I wouldn't knowingly urge people to contact someone who used to stalk him. Apologising for suggesting Spectrum Fairness seemed like the decent thing to do.

Anyone got the slightest idea why they fall over themselves to keep telling everyone that the site is not for sale? Does anyone care? Did anyone ask to buy it? Did Gareth withdraw such an offer? They seem to keep insisting the point like it was meaningful. It is as meaningful as them telling us that they don't live in Frace and then keep stressing that point. Begs the answer "so fucking what?"

Skyblue1 made one post saying that he'd be interested, and Nu said he'd talk to Gareth. That's all it was.

[Jack]

I still think he's an asshole for everything he's done, but I wouldn't knowingly urge people to contact someone who used to stalk him. Apologising for suggesting Spectrum Fairness seemed like the decent thing to do.

Good you're here now.

[Semicolon]

Or maybe it is just that you are hurt and lash out, and everybody who dares to take an even slightly opposing view is the enemy and in liaison with Amy and Gareth.

A groundless accusation. Thus far, I have been the only person to post a thread inviting Gareth to have a civil conversation about what went on. It can clearly be seen that I have allowed Gareth to express his views more than anyone else from AFF. I also apologised to him over the stalker/Spectrum Fairness issue, which brings me to my next point...

Yet you ghey me over an opposing view, clearly angry. Yeah, right.

Wrong again sir. I gheyed you because your post seemed to imply that someone had deliberately asked Gareth's stalker to go after him, which is not the case.

However, I see now that you only saw the Facebook post and not his response on I^2 at the time of posting, so I suppose I'll just let this go.

Why did you owe Gareth an apology?

I still think he's an asshole for everything he's done, but I wouldn't knowingly urge people to contact someone who used to stalk him. Apologising for suggesting Spectrum Fairness seemed like the decent thing to do.

Anyone got the slightest idea why they fall over themselves to keep telling everyone that the site is not for sale? Does anyone care? Did anyone ask to buy it? Did Gareth withdraw such an offer? They seem to keep insisting the point like it was meaningful. It is as meaningful as them telling us that they don't live in Frace and then keep stressing that point. Begs the answer "so fucking what?"

Skyblue1 made one post saying that he'd be interested, and Nu said he'd talk to Gareth. That's all it was.

If I recall correctly, Gareth complained in the past of getting e-mails from people who wanted to buy his domain name. Perhaps they were automated offers made to the owners of popular domain names.

[Al Swearegen]

I think perhaps this paranoia that he projects onto me is just that paranoia.
Add paranoia onto his list of "endearing" traits I guess and projection for that matter.
Funnily thing with projection is that once shown you so project, we. Can look at each claim against us by he and she with that framing.
Crazy,crazy, crazy

[odeon]

They are trying to keep each other at arm's length.

When they take up arms is the time to start worrying.

I'm going to leg it out of here, before Odeon czechs up some puns.

Battling Odeon with puns? You don't have a leg to stand on.

You'd wrist your case if you could, right?

[odeon]

Or maybe it is just that you are hurt and lash out, and everybody who dares to take an even slightly opposing view is the enemy and in liaison with Amy and Gareth.

A groundless accusation. Thus far, I have been the only person to post a thread inviting Gareth to have a civil conversation about what went on. It can clearly be seen that I have allowed Gareth to express his views more than anyone else from AFF. I also apologised to him over the stalker/Spectrum Fairness issue, which brings me to my next point...

Yet you ghey me over an opposing view, clearly angry. Yeah, right.

Wrong again sir. I gheyed you because your post seemed to imply that someone had deliberately asked Gareth's stalker to go after him, which is not the case.

However, I see now that you only saw the Facebook post and not his response on I^2 at the time of posting, so I suppose I'll just let this go.

How very noble of you. A "sorry, my mistake" would have helped your credibility more.

[BlueGriffyn]

The point that someone from AFF had deliberately asked Gareth's stalker to come back was still implied without sufficient evidence being presented. Whether or not you saw all of the posts is pretty much irrelevant. All that proved was that you didn't post the misinformation out of malice, but it was still a very serious accusation to make without actually taking the time to gather evidence from any source other than Gareth's one post. This certainly doesn't improve the credibility of any information you post, does it?

You fail, yet again. Condolences to you, thanks for playing, ba-bye.