Agenda 21

[RageBeoulve]

odeon is a she?! Wait... who are we talking about again?

I'm not sure, but apparently it's serious enough that Rage's girlfriend is jumping in to defend him.

Shes right, Elle. You have got being passive aggressive down to a lulzy science. Here is your reward.

[odeon]

Right, so you have evidence, but you're not going to show it to us, and yet you expect us to believe it?

I call bullshit.

I just posted some perfectly credible material which illustrates the socialism facism connection. Its in my impeach Obama thread. Mobbing me won't work. Try talking to me, and asking questions. Soaf is doing rather well I think. And you were too, that day we talked in chat.

[RageBeoulve]

Right, so you have evidence, but you're not going to show it to us, and yet you expect us to believe it?

I call bullshit.

I just posted some perfectly credible material which illustrates the socialism facism connection. Its in my impeach Obama thread. Mobbing me won't work. Try talking to me, and asking questions. Soaf is doing rather well I think. And you were too, that day we talked in chat.

Heil.

http://www.businessinsider.com/bob-woodward-obama-sequester-white-house-reporting-price-politics-2013-2

[Beardy McFuckface]

Right, so you have evidence, but you're not going to show it to us, and yet you expect us to believe it?

I call bullshit.

I just posted some perfectly credible material which illustrates the socialism facism connection. Its in my impeach Obama thread. Mobbing me won't work. Try talking to me, and asking questions. Soaf is doing rather well I think. And you were too, that day we talked in chat.

Already answered.

I'm still wondering why you're not showing the evidence at hand, using excuses such as "I'll send it privately" and "oh, I'm busy IRL".

What I'm starting to feel is that you've no real evidence to back up your claims, and you're most likely scurrying about to find anything that at least backs up some of your argument. In other words, I'm starting to think that you formed conclusions, and only now you're looking for evidence. But hey, that's just speculation on my behalf, but it would not be surprising if it turns out to be true.

[TheoK]

It's not necessary to "invent" conspiracies. There are enough of real ones revealed, like the NSA shit, for instance. 

[Beardy McFuckface]

No ones disproving legitimate conspiracies here.

[odeon]

I'm not buying this one, though.

[Adam]

The worst conspiracy is the I2 one and all the stuff going on in the secret admin forum

Now THAT is some real nazi fascist communist shit right there

[RageBeoulve]

Right, so you have evidence, but you're not going to show it to us, and yet you expect us to believe it?

I call bullshit.

I just posted some perfectly credible material which illustrates the socialism facism connection. Its in my impeach Obama thread. Mobbing me won't work. Try talking to me, and asking questions. Soaf is doing rather well I think. And you were too, that day we talked in chat.

Already answered.

I'm still wondering why you're not showing the evidence at hand, using excuses such as "I'll send it privately" and "oh, I'm busy IRL".

What I'm starting to feel is that you've no real evidence to back up your claims, and you're most likely scurrying about to find anything that at least backs up some of your argument. In other words, I'm starting to think that you formed conclusions, and only now you're looking for evidence. But hey, that's just speculation on my behalf, but it would not be surprising if it turns out to be true.

I know what it looks like man, and I should have just pmed the people I thought mattered instead of making a bunch of threads about it. I didn't realize there were so many close minded people about, and I only want to talk to the ones that seem like they'll listen at this point. We'll talk.

[Beardy McFuckface]

People who don't listen = people who expect you to back up your claims. Amirite? 

[El]

[RageBeoulve]

People who don't listen = people who expect you to back up your claims. Amirite? 

No. They're people who will argue with me no matter what I back up my claims with. Nice try though.

[Beardy McFuckface]

People who don't listen = people who expect you to back up your claims. Amirite? 

No. They're people who will argue with me no matter what I back up my claims with. Nice try though.

But you have not shown anything to back up your claims, and even refused to show anything when asked.

All I got from you is a legal document with no correlation to your speculations and a testimonial from some old bint. Neither prove your claims.

[Lestat]

Schleed has a point, as much as it disgusts me to have to admit it.

First time for everything though I guess.

[RageBeoulve]

People who don't listen = people who expect you to back up your claims. Amirite? 

No. They're people who will argue with me no matter what I back up my claims with. Nice try though.

But you have not shown anything to back up your claims, and even refused to show anything when asked.

All I got from you is a legal document with no correlation to your speculations and a testimonial from some old bint. Neither prove your claims.

Which claims? You're going to have to be a little more specific than that.