How many Rolf Harris victims does it take to change a light bulb? 50. Three to do it now and then 47 to do it thirty years later when it is more profitable.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: odeon on June 21, 2013, 03:58:30 PMQuote from: Lit on June 20, 2013, 03:52:45 AMQuote from: odeon on June 19, 2013, 10:57:26 PMQuote from: Lit on June 19, 2013, 02:08:23 AMQuote from: odeon on June 18, 2013, 11:28:55 PMQuote from: Lit on June 18, 2013, 02:48:37 PMThe question is rather if it is possible to keep your privacy - using Tor and encryption and avoiding hotmail, gmail etc?No.Tor will hide your tracks to some extent but using an email provider will basically make your correspondence available to the provider.So even if I would use strong encryption the provider would be able to read it anyway? What about One-time pad?My guess is that it would be difficult to crack.But I wasn't referring to encrypted messages. I'm talking more about internet traffic in general--I doubt most people will encrypt their email because the recipients would have to have access to the same encryption. Setting up encryption in gmail is probably not as easy as one would like.What about hushmail etc? I hate the thought that these creeps might be reading my emails.I honestly don't know.The debate is a bit skewed, though. What people don't realise is how much information there is to read. The problem is not how to read it, the problem is what to read.You are the computer here. You ought to know Check out my latest signature
Quote from: Lit on June 20, 2013, 03:52:45 AMQuote from: odeon on June 19, 2013, 10:57:26 PMQuote from: Lit on June 19, 2013, 02:08:23 AMQuote from: odeon on June 18, 2013, 11:28:55 PMQuote from: Lit on June 18, 2013, 02:48:37 PMThe question is rather if it is possible to keep your privacy - using Tor and encryption and avoiding hotmail, gmail etc?No.Tor will hide your tracks to some extent but using an email provider will basically make your correspondence available to the provider.So even if I would use strong encryption the provider would be able to read it anyway? What about One-time pad?My guess is that it would be difficult to crack.But I wasn't referring to encrypted messages. I'm talking more about internet traffic in general--I doubt most people will encrypt their email because the recipients would have to have access to the same encryption. Setting up encryption in gmail is probably not as easy as one would like.What about hushmail etc? I hate the thought that these creeps might be reading my emails.I honestly don't know.The debate is a bit skewed, though. What people don't realise is how much information there is to read. The problem is not how to read it, the problem is what to read.
Quote from: odeon on June 19, 2013, 10:57:26 PMQuote from: Lit on June 19, 2013, 02:08:23 AMQuote from: odeon on June 18, 2013, 11:28:55 PMQuote from: Lit on June 18, 2013, 02:48:37 PMThe question is rather if it is possible to keep your privacy - using Tor and encryption and avoiding hotmail, gmail etc?No.Tor will hide your tracks to some extent but using an email provider will basically make your correspondence available to the provider.So even if I would use strong encryption the provider would be able to read it anyway? What about One-time pad?My guess is that it would be difficult to crack.But I wasn't referring to encrypted messages. I'm talking more about internet traffic in general--I doubt most people will encrypt their email because the recipients would have to have access to the same encryption. Setting up encryption in gmail is probably not as easy as one would like.What about hushmail etc? I hate the thought that these creeps might be reading my emails.
Quote from: Lit on June 19, 2013, 02:08:23 AMQuote from: odeon on June 18, 2013, 11:28:55 PMQuote from: Lit on June 18, 2013, 02:48:37 PMThe question is rather if it is possible to keep your privacy - using Tor and encryption and avoiding hotmail, gmail etc?No.Tor will hide your tracks to some extent but using an email provider will basically make your correspondence available to the provider.So even if I would use strong encryption the provider would be able to read it anyway? What about One-time pad?My guess is that it would be difficult to crack.But I wasn't referring to encrypted messages. I'm talking more about internet traffic in general--I doubt most people will encrypt their email because the recipients would have to have access to the same encryption. Setting up encryption in gmail is probably not as easy as one would like.
Quote from: odeon on June 18, 2013, 11:28:55 PMQuote from: Lit on June 18, 2013, 02:48:37 PMThe question is rather if it is possible to keep your privacy - using Tor and encryption and avoiding hotmail, gmail etc?No.Tor will hide your tracks to some extent but using an email provider will basically make your correspondence available to the provider.So even if I would use strong encryption the provider would be able to read it anyway? What about One-time pad?
Quote from: Lit on June 18, 2013, 02:48:37 PMThe question is rather if it is possible to keep your privacy - using Tor and encryption and avoiding hotmail, gmail etc?No.Tor will hide your tracks to some extent but using an email provider will basically make your correspondence available to the provider.
The question is rather if it is possible to keep your privacy - using Tor and encryption and avoiding hotmail, gmail etc?
ITS FOR OUR OWN GOOD ITS FOR OUR OWN GOODITS FOR OUR OWN GOOD ITS FOR OUR OWN GOODITS FOR OUR OWN GOOD ITS FOR OUR OWN GOODITS FOR OUR OWN GOOD ITS FOR OUR OWN GOODITS FOR OUR OWN GOOD ITS FOR OUR OWN GOODITS FOR OUR OWN GOOD ITS FOR OUR OWN GOOD
You know? The sad thing is, it really IS that funny when you think about it. I mean how can people actually accept this crap as normal?
Quote from: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2013, 07:44:59 PMYou know? The sad thing is, it really IS that funny when you think about it. I mean how can people actually accept this crap as normal?we have been conditioned.How long ago did Orwell write about such matters? Huxley?Truth is its much, much worse than we know of yet. They let us know little by little to aid in our acceptance if such matters. If it all came to at once, we would be shocked. The system would be shocked revolution would be the reaction to a shocked system.Logically, you do understand that with the technology we currently have....they know everything.
Rage, you might want to think before posting something like that, here. While I wholeheartedly support your right to post moronic content, I will have trouble defending you if our host shuts us down because of a possible TOS violation.Remember that the TOS will restrict us more than the applicable laws.