Indiana legalizes shooting cops

[Jesse]

I have read about people who have tried living outside sociatys rules. they were quite miserable, in the process.
I'd rather play da game. and have all options available to me, like shooting cops and even myself if need be, 

[TheoK]

The money is not from the oppressor, the money is from honest, working Swedes like my parents and my brother. In fact, the oppressors also get their money from the people.

[odeon]

So the check's got your parents' name on? Right.

[TheoK]

You're so lame. You must resort to ad hominem because you have no real arguments.

Some months ago I met a guy from a Swedish board. He is an ex military guy and has been to war, a tough guy in real life and not someone being the king of his own internet board. I told him that I have AS and live on disability. He didn't find anything wrong with that. The opinion of someone like that is worth 1000 times more than yours.

[TA]

Every generation the hands of the cop are tied even more with the the potential of lawsuits and accusations of police brutality. It never fails that one cop that oversteps his bounds ruins it for everybody and causes public backlash.  Over time this has lead to many citizens hating cops and consequently cops start viewing the public as their enemy after a few years on the job. Not all cops are evil corruption mongers, but good cops are ignored because of the actions of the few bad links in the chain that are the reason laws like this are praised by certain elements of the general public. In the 1960's, it was perfectly acceptable to beat the shit out of a guy with your baton if he hit his wife, now you have to put him in the prison system where he meets real criminals and becomes one himself. Which is better, teaching a wife beater a lesson with the business end of your baton and never having a problem with him again or putting him in prison where he is trained in the ways of the common criminal and consequently becomes a chronic problem?

[TheoK]

Neither. The wife should leave him, or better: not being together with an abusive man in the first place.

[TA]

Neither. The wife should leave him, or better: not being together with an abusive man in the first place.

What if it was a first offense and he had never shown any signs of being abusive before?

[bodie]

To me,  in England it is a totally bizarre concept to shoot people legally anyway.   Of all the people to shoot, then shooting cops seems a worthy passtime.  Correction - shooting corrupt cops.

Cops who flout the law are lower than a snakes belly.   

[TheoK]

Neither. The wife should leave him, or better: not being together with an abusive man in the first place.

What if it was a first offense and he had never shown any signs of being abusive before?

That's probably very rare. If someone is able to beat up his wife there were probably some signs to begin with in most cases.

[TheoK]

To me,  in England it is a totally bizarre concept to shoot people legally anyway.   Of all the people to shoot, then shooting cops seems a worthy passtime.  Correction - shooting corrupt cops.

Cops who flout the law are lower than a snakes belly.   

 

[Al Swearegen]

Every generation the hands of the cop are tied even more with the the potential of lawsuits and accusations of police brutality. It never fails that one cop that oversteps his bounds ruins it for everybody and causes public backlash.  Over time this has lead to many citizens hating cops and consequently cops start viewing the public as their enemy after a few years on the job. Not all cops are evil corruption mongers, but good cops are ignored because of the actions of the few bad links in the chain that are the reason laws like this are praised by certain elements of the general public. In the 1960's, it was perfectly acceptable to beat the shit out of a guy with your baton if he hit his wife, now you have to put him in the prison system where he meets real criminals and becomes one himself. Which is better, teaching a wife beater a lesson with the business end of your baton and never having a problem with him again or putting him in prison where he is trained in the ways of the common criminal and consequently becomes a chronic problem?

Only it is not a few bad cops it is a culture

[TheoK]

Every generation the hands of the cop are tied even more with the the potential of lawsuits and accusations of police brutality. It never fails that one cop that oversteps his bounds ruins it for everybody and causes public backlash.  Over time this has lead to many citizens hating cops and consequently cops start viewing the public as their enemy after a few years on the job. Not all cops are evil corruption mongers, but good cops are ignored because of the actions of the few bad links in the chain that are the reason laws like this are praised by certain elements of the general public. In the 1960's, it was perfectly acceptable to beat the shit out of a guy with your baton if he hit his wife, now you have to put him in the prison system where he meets real criminals and becomes one himself. Which is better, teaching a wife beater a lesson with the business end of your baton and never having a problem with him again or putting him in prison where he is trained in the ways of the common criminal and consequently becomes a chronic problem?

Only it is not a few bad cops it is a culture

Exactly.

[TA]

Every generation the hands of the cop are tied even more with the the potential of lawsuits and accusations of police brutality. It never fails that one cop that oversteps his bounds ruins it for everybody and causes public backlash.  Over time this has lead to many citizens hating cops and consequently cops start viewing the public as their enemy after a few years on the job. Not all cops are evil corruption mongers, but good cops are ignored because of the actions of the few bad links in the chain that are the reason laws like this are praised by certain elements of the general public. In the 1960's, it was perfectly acceptable to beat the shit out of a guy with your baton if he hit his wife, now you have to put him in the prison system where he meets real criminals and becomes one himself. Which is better, teaching a wife beater a lesson with the business end of your baton and never having a problem with him again or putting him in prison where he is trained in the ways of the common criminal and consequently becomes a chronic problem?

Only it is not a few bad cops it is a culture

Says who?

[TheoK]

This Swedish cop admits that he and his colleagues committed crimes several hundred times while on duty. And in most countries the cops are worse than in Sweden: http://www.dn.se/Pages/Article.aspx?id=637397&epslanguage=sv

A whole section on the same theme: http://www.dn.se/stories/stories-insidan/storyarkiv-serier/poliskultur/

[Al Swearegen]

Every generation the hands of the cop are tied even more with the the potential of lawsuits and accusations of police brutality. It never fails that one cop that oversteps his bounds ruins it for everybody and causes public backlash.  Over time this has lead to many citizens hating cops and consequently cops start viewing the public as their enemy after a few years on the job. Not all cops are evil corruption mongers, but good cops are ignored because of the actions of the few bad links in the chain that are the reason laws like this are praised by certain elements of the general public. In the 1960's, it was perfectly acceptable to beat the shit out of a guy with your baton if he hit his wife, now you have to put him in the prison system where he meets real criminals and becomes one himself. Which is better, teaching a wife beater a lesson with the business end of your baton and never having a problem with him again or putting him in prison where he is trained in the ways of the common criminal and consequently becomes a chronic problem?

Only it is not a few bad cops it is a culture

Says who?

You aren't serious are you?