Mad Hatter: How far into the rabbit hole do you want to go?
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Here's the thing tho - why aren't we ALL threatening and being total dicks? What's stopping us? Our parents? The police? A strong man with a stick?It is easy to be a total dick. Yet we make a choise not to be one.
Quote from: ZEGH8578 on May 26, 2013, 11:09:06 PMHere's the thing tho - why aren't we ALL threatening and being total dicks? What's stopping us? Our parents? The police? A strong man with a stick?It is easy to be a total dick. Yet we make a choise not to be one. It's easy to be a total dick because humans are total dicks. What's stopping me isn't who I am, it's who I want to be.
Quote from: odeon on May 26, 2013, 10:51:28 PMAre you seriously trying to defend the son of a bitch by saying it's really Bodie's fault because she has talked about her child online? Or am I reading you wrong?Children are a fact of life and for those of us lucky enough to have them, something we tend to be very proud of and talk about. It does not give anyone the right to use them in some kind of sick and twisted "joke".People can try to defend BC but the fact is that he's "joked" about paedophilia one time too many for comfort. He should have his fucking head checked.As in chopped off.No I'm not defending him. just trying to look at it from a different perspective, I think Bodie can do as she pleases. infact she has every right, I'm just saying whoever said those things obviously was trolling the fuck out of her. The police will look at that and determine there are bigger fish to fry in the ocean than some sorry asshole troll
Are you seriously trying to defend the son of a bitch by saying it's really Bodie's fault because she has talked about her child online? Or am I reading you wrong?Children are a fact of life and for those of us lucky enough to have them, something we tend to be very proud of and talk about. It does not give anyone the right to use them in some kind of sick and twisted "joke".People can try to defend BC but the fact is that he's "joked" about paedophilia one time too many for comfort. He should have his fucking head checked.As in chopped off.
Quote from: duckfetishgirl on May 26, 2013, 10:54:19 PMYet it is perfectly a ok for you to post pics of your nieces and nephews? I recall MLA getting on you about that. "You mad, bro? You mad?"I bet you I can find a loophole. It wasn't my kid.
Yet it is perfectly a ok for you to post pics of your nieces and nephews? I recall MLA getting on you about that. "You mad, bro? You mad?"
good and bad are perceptions. however, I kind of sence your balloon somehow popped and now your upset. don't worry girl, I hate it when balloons pop aswell
Quote from: badcucumber on May 26, 2013, 12:40:08 AMQuote from: odeon on May 26, 2013, 12:26:12 AMQuote from: badcucumber on May 25, 2013, 08:27:38 PMIt's not against the law to joke about paedophilia on the internet. Depending on the contents, it can be against our TOS and it is certainly enough to warrant an investigation by our host. We didn't want that kind of attention then and we don't want it now.BC knew what he was doing when posting about paedophilia here. Defend him all you want but he is not welcome here. He won't ever be.I was referring to when bodie CALLED THE POLICE on him. It may be against a TOS and if he is banned, then so be it. I am not defending him, I am only saying it is no reason to call the police and I did not have anything to do with it nor did he use my computer.I have no idea what the paedophile jokes are you claim BC made? On 25th April 2012 at approx 0500 hours (Uk time) a post was made on Zomg by BC who was posting under the name of 'blamethenile' threatening to 'penetrate Bodie's sons hairless butt hole' along with some pictures of young boys in swimming trunks. Is this the 'joke' ? Where is the punchline? Is this hilarious? Are the members here slapping their thighs LOL 'ing at what a rib tickling corker that joke was.The likelihood that BC would have been posting jokes to me is pretty slim considering we were not friends. He blamed me for the changes Adam had to make to ZOMG as i joined the admin team at that time. The board was virtually wiped as it was filled with posts about murder and rape. Those posts were made by BC and Pig equally and later Bruce. Adam didn't want his forum filled with it. BC decided it was me that had implemented the changes. He did this without any just cause or evidence. Bruce was particularly annoying and i must confess i did question everything he posted. However, i was not responsible for any alterations made to his posts or his username. I was blamed anyway. I was also not responsible for changing Pig's username. I was blamed anyway. Finally BC found that his name had been fucked with too, and the post about my son appeared the following morning.The fact was that the person who was fucking with account details and posts was the one BC was laughing and joking with. This was quite funny to myself and the other admins. The admin who was responsible was deemed to be the 'safe' person. The cool person. I had fuck all to do with it but I couldn't say who it was either.So not only was a post made that threatened my five year old, the hate behind it was at totally the wrong person.Now i don't know what the protocol is for dealing with shit like this. I can honestly say no one has ever approached me before about intending to penetrate my childs butt hole. Nope. No one. Friend or foe. I have never before dealt with anyone joking about my son in a sexual manner. If it was intended as a joke as you claim. The fact that BC lives on the other side of the planet really left my options limited as to what action to take.Action was inevitable after posting such content. I couldn't ignore it.I made an inquiry here as to the nature of the posts that got BC banned as it was before my time. I was informed by several members that it was material of a cp nature. I was also told of another website where a similar incident had occurred resulting in a ban also.I should also state that a couple of people thought BC was just trolling. That it was likely to be his sick idea of a joke. They also said that it would be his 'just desserts' if the police quizzed him - just for being a twatt.QuoteI was referring to when bodie CALLED THE POLICE on him. It may be against a TOS and if he is banned, then so be it. I am not defending him, I am only saying it is no reason to call the police and I did not have anything to do with it nor did he use my computer.So i made an enquiry to Howard County Police Dept using the fill in box on their website. I made no phone call at all. Phone calls cost money and i didn't have much at the time. In fact when it became clear that i would have to invest both time and money in pursuit of this i declined any further participation. I was contacted first by Lieutenant Tom EhartCommander / Family Crimes and Sexual Assault DivisionCriminal Investigations BureauHoward County Police Department410-313-2630He took the details of my enquiry. I did not tell him any bullshit. I sent him a copy of the post i had removed, along with the copies of the admin logs to prove the post had come from that ip address and had not been altered by staff. I didn't need to over emphasise anything. He said it was something his dept could help me with.I received an email from Mr Ehart on 2nd May stating that after some investigations he has discovered it is not his jurisdiction. He said the area is covered by Laurel Police Department811 Fifth StreetLaurel, MD 20707301-498-0092He forwarded my complaint to them and they did contact me but i did not persue the matter. I also reported it to his internet provider who told me to report it to www.cybertipline.orgI stopped looking at the email account. It was one of several that i rarely use. I checked it for the first time today and the cybertipline organisation sent me an email in June asking me to clarify. That email did not get any response from me as i only found it today.QuoteMy issue with the people on zomg was that they called the fucking police on my boyfriend. Yes, the actual police. That really pissed me off. And then someone, i personally think it was Adam, bombed my inbox. But calling the authorities on my boyfriend generally is going to make me flip out. You claim you didn't know him at the time.QuoteIt doesn't really matter what I think about pedo jokes as I didn't make any. i stayed out of it, I know he can be a jerk sometimes. But that is no reason to call the police on someoneI thought you did not meet him until June.QuoteDuckgirl I did not let him use my phone or laptop for anything and I had no idea what was said or done until after the cops were called. I had nothing to do with it. nothing. I just think it is silly to make such a big deal over a joke. And a joke someone else made, too. There is a general unwritten law around here that no one talks to the police unless it is to do with rape or kids. As the post was about raping my five year olds 'hairless butt hole' i think it is quite clear why i applied the same rule here. So, you have no control over what your man posts, he posts whatever he likes. He never made any dodgy posts on your stuff despite the fact that you hadn't met when the posts in question were made? you have stated this several times and yet i see no one accusing you of letting a complete stranger use your things.Just to clarify then, you managed to 'stay out of it' when his post was made on 25th April that resulted in my action to CALL THE COPS even though you didn't meet him til June!How is it you are so 'flipped' out about an altercation that occurred between myself and your current partner when it was (as you keep saying) two months before you met ?It makes little sense to me. I hope i have cleared up any confusion.
Quote from: odeon on May 26, 2013, 12:26:12 AMQuote from: badcucumber on May 25, 2013, 08:27:38 PMIt's not against the law to joke about paedophilia on the internet. Depending on the contents, it can be against our TOS and it is certainly enough to warrant an investigation by our host. We didn't want that kind of attention then and we don't want it now.BC knew what he was doing when posting about paedophilia here. Defend him all you want but he is not welcome here. He won't ever be.I was referring to when bodie CALLED THE POLICE on him. It may be against a TOS and if he is banned, then so be it. I am not defending him, I am only saying it is no reason to call the police and I did not have anything to do with it nor did he use my computer.
Quote from: badcucumber on May 25, 2013, 08:27:38 PMIt's not against the law to joke about paedophilia on the internet. Depending on the contents, it can be against our TOS and it is certainly enough to warrant an investigation by our host. We didn't want that kind of attention then and we don't want it now.BC knew what he was doing when posting about paedophilia here. Defend him all you want but he is not welcome here. He won't ever be.
It's not against the law to joke about paedophilia on the internet.
I was referring to when bodie CALLED THE POLICE on him. It may be against a TOS and if he is banned, then so be it. I am not defending him, I am only saying it is no reason to call the police and I did not have anything to do with it nor did he use my computer.
My issue with the people on zomg was that they called the fucking police on my boyfriend. Yes, the actual police. That really pissed me off. And then someone, i personally think it was Adam, bombed my inbox. But calling the authorities on my boyfriend generally is going to make me flip out.
It doesn't really matter what I think about pedo jokes as I didn't make any. i stayed out of it, I know he can be a jerk sometimes. But that is no reason to call the police on someone
Duckgirl I did not let him use my phone or laptop for anything and I had no idea what was said or done until after the cops were called. I had nothing to do with it. nothing. I just think it is silly to make such a big deal over a joke. And a joke someone else made, too.
I can do upside down chocolate moo things!
I've rarely had proper exchanges with Richard. Our most rewarding conversation was when he insisted I was black, and I insisted I was not. I am still not black btw.
Quote from: ZEGH8578 on May 26, 2013, 11:09:06 PM I've rarely had proper exchanges with Richard. Our most rewarding conversation was when he insisted I was black, and I insisted I was not. I am still not black btw.Are you a hot white boy? yes you are. If you call me black I might get upset and really turn Red.
