Yes. That's what I think. I didn't bother nitpicking every instance where you used the words 'you said' in this discussion, where I disagreed that's what I said, because that's your opinion and interpretation of what I said. Yes, do see why you're having difficulty here. You're free to think whatever you wish about what you said, and so am I. Your reaction, or anyone else's reaction to what I think isn't going to change what I think. This is where your difficulty lies. Am actually going to stop responding to this now. It would be easier to do that without you posing more questions. Of course, you are free ask me more questions, but am having trouble seeing the point is us continuing this. I'm not going to say you are in the right in calling cartman a dog fucker because I don't think that's true, but I will say your point of view in this discussion in valid because you believe it and it's important to you.
Nor DID I call him a dog-fucker if you were actually being honest. You are being honest right? That is not your way of making a claim that is complete bullshit (and you know is bullshit, because I got you to find where i actually said that, and you couldn't) is it?
See that is the thing about accusing people, it is not just opinion.
Someone DID accuse him of screwing dogs. Accused him a number of years ago. That person was not me. I DID:
1) Say I had read this somewhere
2) Did post the quote by someone else where THEY made such a claim.
3) I did say I had not made it up - Someone else may have but it did not originate from me
4) I did say I was just creating rumours - you know rumours don't you Jack. Ask yourself "Rumours are true stories or false stories?" ask yourself again "If I was disclaiming something as all rumour am I wanting it to be seen as a truth or not?"
Well....that is it. That was the "evidence" of me calling him a "dog fucker"
Problem is....I didn't...anywhere.
So you say
I'm not going to say you are in the right in calling cartman a dog fucker because I don't think that's true
but then if I didn't say that about him (as evidenced by your inability to find where I did and....well the fact I did not) then what bloody sense does your statement really make?
You keep falling over on this sticking point. I should not call Cartman a dog fucker. I didn't so therefore I get to believe what's important and you should believe I should not have called him a name I did not call him?
Jack that is silly.
Stop saying I have called him a dog fucker, and find where I have. It would be an insult to your integrity, credibility and intellect to hold a position you know to be incorrect. You have already gone searching when I asked you last time and you could not find something you stated 'that is exactly what you said". So it is not that you even "think" I said it. You have search and "know" I have not said it.
Just as you know what things I did say were not in breach of Laws, TOS or Rules. You know this too. Maybe you did not at the start of this thread but you do now.
"There are no boundaries here over what may be said, save for one rule - be prepared to back up your words."
I will not contest your right to say I have called Alfonso dog fucker but you need to find where I called him that in the first place. I AM aware others have past and present but you made the charge to me....so back it. You really have not.