By the way here's one source discussing the risks of GMOs:
http://www.responsibletechnology.org/faqshttp://responsibletechnology.org/gmo-educationhttp://www.responsibletechnology.org/gmo-dangers/65-health-risksThese parts are especially interesting:
What about GM hormones in milk?
Milk from rBGH-treated cows contains an increased amount of the hormone IGF-1, which is one of the highest risk factors associated with breast and prostate cancer, but no one is tracking this in relation to cancer rates.
http://responsibletechnology.org/gmo-dangers/65-health-risks/2notes#mutations]2.4 The promoter may accidentally switch on harmful genes
1. Promoters are switches that turn on genes.
2. The promoter used in nearly all GM crops is designed to permanently turn on the foreign gene at high output.
3. Although scientists had claimed that the promoter would only turn on the foreign gene, it can accidentally turn on other natural plant genes—permanently.
4. These genes may overproduce an allergen, toxin, carcinogen or antinutrient, or regulators that block other genes.
So even my assumption of cancer risk from GMO crops is not that unfounded nor exclusive to my own opinion. Not solid proof but it demonstrates my concern is a valid one shared by some experts. The source even mentions cases of lab rats and livestock suffering health problems, even dying as well as the cross-pollination contamination and its environmental effects.
But since you admitted you're not taking my posts seriously, I am wasting my time. Still, sharing this stuff may be of interest to anyone else reading this thread.
