Sex is one of the most wholesome, beautiful and natural experiences that money can buy.-Steve Martin
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Semicolon on January 06, 2015, 04:24:38 AMQuote from: odeon on January 05, 2015, 02:37:32 PMA so-called Dobsonian telescope will give you the largest aperture for your money. If you are into deep sky observing, you should consider one.Why is it "so-called". Is it not really Dobsonian? It's a Newtonian with a mount made popular by Dobson in the 70s.
Quote from: odeon on January 05, 2015, 02:37:32 PMA so-called Dobsonian telescope will give you the largest aperture for your money. If you are into deep sky observing, you should consider one.Why is it "so-called". Is it not really Dobsonian?
A so-called Dobsonian telescope will give you the largest aperture for your money. If you are into deep sky observing, you should consider one.
Jesus died on the cross to show us that BDSM is a legitimate form of love.
There is only one truth and it is that people do have penises of different sizes and one of them is the longest.
Quote from: odeon on January 06, 2015, 12:14:57 PMQuote from: Semicolon on January 06, 2015, 04:24:38 AMQuote from: odeon on January 05, 2015, 02:37:32 PMA so-called Dobsonian telescope will give you the largest aperture for your money. If you are into deep sky observing, you should consider one.Why is it "so-called". Is it not really Dobsonian? It's a Newtonian with a mount made popular by Dobson in the 70s. So they lied. Kill them!
Quote from: Semicolon on January 06, 2015, 02:40:03 PMQuote from: odeon on January 06, 2015, 12:14:57 PMQuote from: Semicolon on January 06, 2015, 04:24:38 AMQuote from: odeon on January 05, 2015, 02:37:32 PMA so-called Dobsonian telescope will give you the largest aperture for your money. If you are into deep sky observing, you should consider one.Why is it "so-called". Is it not really Dobsonian? It's a Newtonian with a mount made popular by Dobson in the 70s. So they lied. Kill them! All of them? And should Dobson be allowed to live? If he is dead, that is.
Quote from: odeon on January 06, 2015, 11:51:51 PMQuote from: Semicolon on January 06, 2015, 02:40:03 PMQuote from: odeon on January 06, 2015, 12:14:57 PMQuote from: Semicolon on January 06, 2015, 04:24:38 AMQuote from: odeon on January 05, 2015, 02:37:32 PMA so-called Dobsonian telescope will give you the largest aperture for your money. If you are into deep sky observing, you should consider one.Why is it "so-called". Is it not really Dobsonian? It's a Newtonian with a mount made popular by Dobson in the 70s. So they lied. Kill them! All of them? And should Dobson be allowed to live? If he is dead, that is.Sadly, Dobson is dead. I suppose that the rest can be spared, this time.
Quote from: Semicolon on January 07, 2015, 08:09:21 AMQuote from: odeon on January 06, 2015, 11:51:51 PMQuote from: Semicolon on January 06, 2015, 02:40:03 PMQuote from: odeon on January 06, 2015, 12:14:57 PMQuote from: Semicolon on January 06, 2015, 04:24:38 AMQuote from: odeon on January 05, 2015, 02:37:32 PMA so-called Dobsonian telescope will give you the largest aperture for your money. If you are into deep sky observing, you should consider one.Why is it "so-called". Is it not really Dobsonian? It's a Newtonian with a mount made popular by Dobson in the 70s. So they lied. Kill them! All of them? And should Dobson be allowed to live? If he is dead, that is.Sadly, Dobson is dead. I suppose that the rest can be spared, this time. There's more to being Dobsonian, though, not just the mount. The main reflector is supposed to be thin so it isn't actually enough to use the mount.But if he's dead he probably won't care.
A British physicist, Julian Barbour, suggests that time is simply an illusion.
Quote from: odeon on January 08, 2015, 11:51:00 PMA British physicist, Julian Barbour, suggests that time is simply an illusion.Do you agree with that or find any logic in it? That seems like saying motion, or lack of it, is an illusion, because lack of motion really is an illusion. Makes more sense time is simply relative just like motion, and directly related to speed.
^Is it because we are a different shape?
Nope, I'm not going to even try.