I call out Butterflies and Sir Les

[Al Swearegen]

He posted in this thread several hours after his post about going back to work. But didn't respond to butterflies post then. in fact he didnt reply to it until others asked him why he hadnt

SO

Six have looked no ideas.  Yes I am impatient as I have to get back to work and this is serious shit as far as the board goes

Butterflies you seem to love to stir up the drama whether you are at the heart of it or pushing it along from the sidelines then acting all innocent like you have been slighted in some way.  Sir Les I like you but at times you drone on treating your point like a punching bag hitting it over and over. 

Why do you put more of the blame on Butterflies rather than Sir Les? In my opinion, both should be equally to blame.

STFU off to the peanut gallery with you

Yes you are right that there were plenty of threads all about the same thing around the board, and in all probability he had not seen this one, rather than ignoring it. So what was your point?

[Adam]

um, that second post was posted IN this thread

[Al Swearegen]

um, that second post was posted IN this thread

Yes it was. So had he seen it or had he ignored it. Had you assumed he had seen it and not replied or had you assumed he had not seen it? If the former, then what good reason would he have had to ignore it?

[Adam]

if he posted in the thread, then he likely saw it.

[Al Swearegen]

if he posted in the thread, then he likely saw it.

Yes and because he replied to the question then it proves he saw...but he did not reply?
So he did not reply to the question and that means he either did see it and not reply or he did not see it.
If he did not see it then he has good reason for not replying.
If he did see it then he may or may not have good reason to have not replied.
Maybe you could ask him OR maybe it would be far easier to assume he definitely saw it and was deliberately not replying.

So...why do you think he would not want to reply to your question? (I think because he did not see it)

[Adam]

oh fucking hell les

 

i dont really care either way tbh. and iff parts comes om and says he didnt see it then i believe him

your posts are ridiculous

[Al Swearegen]

oh fucking hell les

 

i dont really care either way tbh. and iff parts comes om and says he didnt see it then i believe him

your posts are ridiculous

I know you didn't care. You just wanted to agree with Emile, who was crapping on, I get it.
I just wanted you to give a conspiracy-like answer why Parts would not entertain the post if he saw it. It looked suspiciously to me like more bullshit. I agree it doesn't matter, and never did.

[Adam]

No conspiracy. the point is that most people seem to be thinking butterflies is more to blame for this than you are, and therefore parts was paying more attention to your post becuase he had more of a problem with butterflies

[Parts]

He posted in this thread several hours after his post about going back to work. But didn't respond to butterflies post then. in fact he didnt reply to it until others asked him why he hadnt

SO

Six have looked no ideas.  Yes I am impatient as I have to get back to work and this is serious shit as far as the board goes

Butterflies you seem to love to stir up the drama whether you are at the heart of it or pushing it along from the sidelines then acting all innocent like you have been slighted in some way.  Sir Les I like you but at times you drone on treating your point like a punching bag hitting it over and over. 

Why do you put more of the blame on Butterflies rather than Sir Les? In my opinion, both should be equally to blame.

STFU off to the peanut gallery with you

My My you have a mighty big fucking chip on your shoulder .  Why didn't I reply right away?  Well I was hoping to see a bit of progress before I made a full reply  if you check the karma  log you will see that I did indeed plus her for replying and was happy that she did.  I do feel she wants to put this behind us but think it could be impossible the way some fan the flames of drama  and see meaning in things that is not there.

[Al Swearegen]

No conspiracy. the point is that most people seem to be thinking butterflies is more to blame for this than you are, and therefore parts was paying more attention to your post becuase he had more of a problem with butterflies

Quite honestly most people i think don't care. They just want a site free of this bullshit. People do not care what will stop the bullshit they just want it to. They don't care what the solution is so long as it happens. They have suggested a truce and moderation as two alternatives.

The truth is I am far from an innocent party in this. I perpetuate any drama. I acknowledge this freely and honestly. I simply do not start it. I contest that my calling a truce will not stop it, it will just mean when the next barrage of bullshit starts, I will be anuable to react on it. Others may or it may just be a group of you pour shit on I2 over and over uncontested. That is not what the site wants and is not good for the site. Neither is the current atmosphere.

They, like I, have seen over the last few months a small group of you start more and more bullshit. Of this little group Butterflies probably the most noticable in her approach to this and me in my opposition to this. But we are not the only ones and that is why Parts phrased the callout as he did and I suspect that others feel the same.

It is not beyond possibility to get the site back on track and to have the atmosphere alot nicer but it requires a (perhaps concerted) effort to stop actively shitting on the site. If this happens i revert back to my normal cantankerous self and things settle down peoople sigh relief and can walk through the halls of Intensitysquared without being knee deep in bullshit.

Just about having some sense of respect to the other members here and the site in general.

[Adam]

My My you have a mighty big fucking chip on your shoulder .

i do? I don't think I do tbh. And ok you plussed her for the post. I didn';t see that 

[Adam]

oh and Les I'm not reading that

[Al Swearegen]

oh and Les I'm not reading that

Shame.

[Pyraxis]

The truth is I am far from an innocent party in this. I perpetuate any drama. I acknowledge this freely and honestly. I simply do not start it. I contest that my calling a truce will not stop it, it will just mean when the next barrage of bullshit starts, I will be anuable to react on it. Others may or it may just be a group of you pour shit on I2 over and over uncontested. That is not what the site wants and is not good for the site. Neither is the current atmosphere.

Sure you can react. You can say something like "well crap, I see it starting up all over again. I don't want to have to hound you all over the site until you drop it."

Or Adam could say "fuck it Les, you're obsessing again, I'm not answering this bullshit" kinda like he's already been doing, but then really seriously not answer it anywhere.

Either of those would stop the drama straight in its tracks. And now you guys know what happens when you don't stop, you'd maybe actually take it seriously.

[Émile Armand]

I thought the callout had ended?

I'm not sure. I imagine Parts would want to see if me and Les are prepared to come to a truce.

You think parts cares about your view on the matter? He clearly dismissed your post, but got to more important matters and  responded to mine.

Go fuck yourself troll

I am glad you finally responded to butterflies after 2 people wondered why you ignored her post.

Had he ignored her or had he been working?

Right. I guess he was working when he decided to reply to me instead of butterflies.

Circle jerk.