"Online interaction is like two hungry cannibals sucking each other off in a classic 69 - it requires trust." --DD
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Émile Armand on February 02, 2012, 09:35:43 PMPoint to where I made that statement. Quote from: Émile Armand on February 02, 2012, 09:26:29 PMYou are not that clever. He has not been in this thread for 4 days.
Point to where I made that statement.
You are not that clever. He has not been in this thread for 4 days.
Quote from: Pikajedi3 on February 02, 2012, 09:37:47 PMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 02, 2012, 09:35:43 PMPoint to where I made that statement. Quote from: Émile Armand on February 02, 2012, 09:26:29 PMYou are not that clever. He has not been in this thread for 4 days.I asked you a question. You have refused to give a response other than the "orly" response. Do you normally need others to answer for you? Can you not come up with your own conclusion on your own? We shall wait for others to answer so you can answer.
zippo or colibri?
Quote from: Al Swearengen on February 01, 2012, 08:23:39 PMQuote from: skyblue1 on February 01, 2012, 06:40:22 PMQuote from: Al Swearengen on January 28, 2012, 09:59:11 PMThis is the whole not following up thing (i think this was the third of the four options i presented you). Smart play Gareth.Callaway is absolutely right. I am direct and I do not pull punches. I certainly will not be organising others to attack Amy and doing gagged avatars and that kind of bullshit, when the most direct play is going straight at the source. Furthermore if you DID want to know who was organising all of this it would really come down to two people (if not me) wouldn't it? Think back on who were two of the biggest personalities there at the time. It will be one or the other. It simply was not me.Ironically most of the people there, even the ones I had fought with, liked me and/or respected me (because i fought fairly and honestly), so I doubt there was any fabricated evidence from another member. IU think it was a convenient lie and smear by Amy. Callaway is also right. You have spoent a lot of time from the sounds doing your half-hearted investigation when the easiest thing to do would be to ask Amy.Can we all be completely honest here Gareth?Can you admit that even were you to exhaust every avenue to finding tht there was no Pm, you would still not admit your wife would lie?Can you admit that the reason you did this research but not ask her is that she would go "histronic" on you, as Calavera has suggested?"Can you admit that all I have said, my general personality, the time as it was and your wife's want to get rid of me, and the lack of evidence you can find, really makes it look more than reasonably that i am dead right here?I would guess that particular matter was orchestrated by Max The Bear or Evil Zakkie. With Grumpy as an interested bystander ( werent we all?)Which is why I felt that Bloke was one of those two at one time,Just my rememberances from that time periodPretty much right Skyblue. I was an interested bystander. Actually bit more than interested. I was privvy to the PM's and such just did not partake or organise anything. I was actively after my own style of resolution through Amy (who I saw as the problem). What I did not do is colude or organise anything. I am a little bit too unsophisticated for subtlety. Why do gagged avatars and stay of posting measures and the like when you can go straight to the heart of the matter?To be accused of this is not only out of character to what anyone knows of me, but a lie. A rather transparent and blatant one.I just read this thread because I have heard of Gareth and AFF but Al Swearengen you need to get over something that happened 4 years ago on an internet forum, as mentioned.Gareth, what was the goal of Aspies For Freedom?
Quote from: skyblue1 on February 01, 2012, 06:40:22 PMQuote from: Al Swearengen on January 28, 2012, 09:59:11 PMThis is the whole not following up thing (i think this was the third of the four options i presented you). Smart play Gareth.Callaway is absolutely right. I am direct and I do not pull punches. I certainly will not be organising others to attack Amy and doing gagged avatars and that kind of bullshit, when the most direct play is going straight at the source. Furthermore if you DID want to know who was organising all of this it would really come down to two people (if not me) wouldn't it? Think back on who were two of the biggest personalities there at the time. It will be one or the other. It simply was not me.Ironically most of the people there, even the ones I had fought with, liked me and/or respected me (because i fought fairly and honestly), so I doubt there was any fabricated evidence from another member. IU think it was a convenient lie and smear by Amy. Callaway is also right. You have spoent a lot of time from the sounds doing your half-hearted investigation when the easiest thing to do would be to ask Amy.Can we all be completely honest here Gareth?Can you admit that even were you to exhaust every avenue to finding tht there was no Pm, you would still not admit your wife would lie?Can you admit that the reason you did this research but not ask her is that she would go "histronic" on you, as Calavera has suggested?"Can you admit that all I have said, my general personality, the time as it was and your wife's want to get rid of me, and the lack of evidence you can find, really makes it look more than reasonably that i am dead right here?I would guess that particular matter was orchestrated by Max The Bear or Evil Zakkie. With Grumpy as an interested bystander ( werent we all?)Which is why I felt that Bloke was one of those two at one time,Just my rememberances from that time periodPretty much right Skyblue. I was an interested bystander. Actually bit more than interested. I was privvy to the PM's and such just did not partake or organise anything. I was actively after my own style of resolution through Amy (who I saw as the problem). What I did not do is colude or organise anything. I am a little bit too unsophisticated for subtlety. Why do gagged avatars and stay of posting measures and the like when you can go straight to the heart of the matter?To be accused of this is not only out of character to what anyone knows of me, but a lie. A rather transparent and blatant one.
Quote from: Al Swearengen on January 28, 2012, 09:59:11 PMThis is the whole not following up thing (i think this was the third of the four options i presented you). Smart play Gareth.Callaway is absolutely right. I am direct and I do not pull punches. I certainly will not be organising others to attack Amy and doing gagged avatars and that kind of bullshit, when the most direct play is going straight at the source. Furthermore if you DID want to know who was organising all of this it would really come down to two people (if not me) wouldn't it? Think back on who were two of the biggest personalities there at the time. It will be one or the other. It simply was not me.Ironically most of the people there, even the ones I had fought with, liked me and/or respected me (because i fought fairly and honestly), so I doubt there was any fabricated evidence from another member. IU think it was a convenient lie and smear by Amy. Callaway is also right. You have spoent a lot of time from the sounds doing your half-hearted investigation when the easiest thing to do would be to ask Amy.Can we all be completely honest here Gareth?Can you admit that even were you to exhaust every avenue to finding tht there was no Pm, you would still not admit your wife would lie?Can you admit that the reason you did this research but not ask her is that she would go "histronic" on you, as Calavera has suggested?"Can you admit that all I have said, my general personality, the time as it was and your wife's want to get rid of me, and the lack of evidence you can find, really makes it look more than reasonably that i am dead right here?I would guess that particular matter was orchestrated by Max The Bear or Evil Zakkie. With Grumpy as an interested bystander ( werent we all?)Which is why I felt that Bloke was one of those two at one time,Just my rememberances from that time period
This is the whole not following up thing (i think this was the third of the four options i presented you). Smart play Gareth.Callaway is absolutely right. I am direct and I do not pull punches. I certainly will not be organising others to attack Amy and doing gagged avatars and that kind of bullshit, when the most direct play is going straight at the source. Furthermore if you DID want to know who was organising all of this it would really come down to two people (if not me) wouldn't it? Think back on who were two of the biggest personalities there at the time. It will be one or the other. It simply was not me.Ironically most of the people there, even the ones I had fought with, liked me and/or respected me (because i fought fairly and honestly), so I doubt there was any fabricated evidence from another member. IU think it was a convenient lie and smear by Amy. Callaway is also right. You have spoent a lot of time from the sounds doing your half-hearted investigation when the easiest thing to do would be to ask Amy.Can we all be completely honest here Gareth?Can you admit that even were you to exhaust every avenue to finding tht there was no Pm, you would still not admit your wife would lie?Can you admit that the reason you did this research but not ask her is that she would go "histronic" on you, as Calavera has suggested?"Can you admit that all I have said, my general personality, the time as it was and your wife's want to get rid of me, and the lack of evidence you can find, really makes it look more than reasonably that i am dead right here?
I do not recall making any proclamations. Stating my opinion and suggestions for you on the matter is not a proclamation.Does Gareth come on here ever?
He did show you as per your want by posting the quote where you said he has not been here for 4 days. He HAS in fact been here but has not posted. Two entirely different things. So he showed you this.Now here is a question. Who is your favourite troll?
Quote from: Al Swearengen on February 04, 2012, 06:41:35 AMHe did show you as per your want by posting the quote where you said he has not been here for 4 days. He HAS in fact been here but has not posted. Two entirely different things. So he showed you this.Now here is a question. Who is your favourite troll?The one from the philosopher's stone that was in the dungeon
Quote from: Zippo on January 31, 2012, 11:21:32 PMzippo or colibri?err, zippo?
Quote from: Gareth on February 06, 2012, 04:01:08 AMQuote from: Zippo on January 31, 2012, 11:21:32 PMzippo or colibri?err, zippo?
Quote from: Émile Armand on February 02, 2012, 12:50:55 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on February 01, 2012, 08:23:39 PMQuote from: skyblue1 on February 01, 2012, 06:40:22 PMQuote from: Al Swearengen on January 28, 2012, 09:59:11 PMThis is the whole not following up thing (i think this was the third of the four options i presented you). Smart play Gareth.Callaway is absolutely right. I am direct and I do not pull punches. I certainly will not be organising others to attack Amy and doing gagged avatars and that kind of bullshit, when the most direct play is going straight at the source. Furthermore if you DID want to know who was organising all of this it would really come down to two people (if not me) wouldn't it? Think back on who were two of the biggest personalities there at the time. It will be one or the other. It simply was not me.Ironically most of the people there, even the ones I had fought with, liked me and/or respected me (because i fought fairly and honestly), so I doubt there was any fabricated evidence from another member. IU think it was a convenient lie and smear by Amy. Callaway is also right. You have spoent a lot of time from the sounds doing your half-hearted investigation when the easiest thing to do would be to ask Amy.Can we all be completely honest here Gareth?Can you admit that even were you to exhaust every avenue to finding tht there was no Pm, you would still not admit your wife would lie?Can you admit that the reason you did this research but not ask her is that she would go "histronic" on you, as Calavera has suggested?"Can you admit that all I have said, my general personality, the time as it was and your wife's want to get rid of me, and the lack of evidence you can find, really makes it look more than reasonably that i am dead right here?I would guess that particular matter was orchestrated by Max The Bear or Evil Zakkie. With Grumpy as an interested bystander ( werent we all?)Which is why I felt that Bloke was one of those two at one time,Just my rememberances from that time periodPretty much right Skyblue. I was an interested bystander. Actually bit more than interested. I was privvy to the PM's and such just did not partake or organise anything. I was actively after my own style of resolution through Amy (who I saw as the problem). What I did not do is colude or organise anything. I am a little bit too unsophisticated for subtlety. Why do gagged avatars and stay of posting measures and the like when you can go straight to the heart of the matter?To be accused of this is not only out of character to what anyone knows of me, but a lie. A rather transparent and blatant one.I just read this thread because I have heard of Gareth and AFF but Al Swearengen you need to get over something that happened 4 years ago on an internet forum, as mentioned.Gareth, what was the goal of Aspies For Freedom?Originally, to get autism rights activism to go offline by encouraging offline local groups - that didn't have anywhere near the success I hoped for.
Laugh all you want but this directs quite a few members that wouldnt normally care for this place here.Even Dw_A_mum has an account to see some of the secret sections(dont know which but she has approached me about things that were said on peanut gallery...)
