We already know TCO behaves like a cunt. does that mean that others have to? Does it make it OK? Desirable, even?
It is not desirable but why should anyone not act like a cunt to TCO?
My point was a very big fuss was made of frankly a very small remark , something which is miniscule in comparison to what TCO said and yet he did not get the shit Butterflies did.
It's not the remark, it never was, it's the viciousness displayed and the total lack of remorse, later thinly disguised. It's that an innocent person was caught in the crossfire in her eagerness to flame what was an exceptionally easy target. It's the cold calculation when planning and the gloat when recapitulating perceived victories, and the willingness to always take it a little bit further.
And the fuss I create now is nothing in comparison, but important, nevertheless. I think it's necessary for her to find out about how things are on the receiving end for a change.
you might want to look up the threads and study the order in which the drama unfolded.
I have.
Butterflies did not start with attacks on his family members she retaliated.
A shame you didn't keep the context. You wrote this:
but none of us started mud slinging until Pandora flung insults at Bodie , THAT is when insults were aimed at Pandora and when the "Rancidora" name started being used.
You didn't start the mud-slinging at FB first, you started it here.
In fact I seem to remember TCO was sending PM's to Butterflies at first about her family , so Butterflies may not be any better in a sense , but at least she had the balls to say it in the open.
The two wrongs does make a right argument, with a twist. I have already commented on those.
Not sure I read it at the time, only when the drama spread and eris brought it up. When I was made aware of it, the main focus was already on eris's case. I do believe I did address it, though.
Right ok , I take that back then.
Parakeet, AFAIK, was never collateral damage like Pandora was, but quite active elsewhere. I never read the WP threads but as I understood it at the time, you had legitimate issues to settle and that sort of thing was part of the concept behind I2, as Pyraxis and others will confirm. Do you see the difference between someone like Parakeet and Pandora?
If you don't, please tell me why.
Parakeet made comments towards Soph and threatened legal action.
Pandora made comments about Butterflies and Binty.
There is a lot of similarities so I don't see how you can say Parakeet was justified and Pandora wasn't.
Parakeet was a participant. Pandora hadn't said a word when she was forced into this. You are confusing the timeline again, unless you support pre-emptive strikes.
I'm not saying I can't be inconsistent--I believe I pointed it out in a previous post. Quite the contrary. In this case I fail to see a double standard, however.
Read above.
Did. I still don't see a double standard.
