All you straight people......

[midlifeaspie]

We all know AIDS came from some sick monkeys who raped a couple of gays.

Dexter thinks it was the other way around.

[Squidusa]

We all know AIDS came from some sick monkeys who raped a couple of gays.

Dexter thinks it was the other way around.

What can I say?

I definately want to marry a chimp and fuck it's brains out. 

[Calavera]

We all know AIDS came from some sick monkeys who raped a couple of gays.

Dexter thinks it was the other way around.

What can I say?

I definately want to marry a chimp and fuck it's brains out. 

It's clearly because you're a homosexual that you're such a pervert.

[Squidusa]

We all know AIDS came from some sick monkeys who raped a couple of gays.

Dexter thinks it was the other way around.

What can I say?

I definately want to marry a chimp and fuck it's brains out. 

It's clearly because you're a homosexual that you're such a pervert.

You mean the two things are seperate?! 

[Al Swearegen]

You know what the irony is in this?
Who started the widespead epidemic that is AIDS? Straight men and straight women.
Started in Africa in the 1930's orhaned baby monkeys valued by some african tribes were (if the were still suckling) nursed by african native women.
They often were infected and passed on the infection through the trasmission of bodily fluids namely blood and breast milk.
Back then the Aids virus had not transmuted.
Unfaithful husbands and some unfaithful women would have sex with locals from other tribes and so it progressed out towards the ports of Africa, in time. Now we are not talking Aids as we know it. But the virus evolved. By the time tourists and sailors bought home the gift of Aids from their time inport with local women, back home, Aids had started to takle its toll.
Come 1980's it was a nasty killing virus.
Why was it mainly in the gay and drug using communities? Well the sharing of needles and as one gay an said in a documentary. "Well we did not ever use condoms. I mean neither of us would get pregnant."
Aids history 101.
There is irony. Were it not for straight women and men not being able to keep their "affections" limited to their partners Aids would not have spread past the villages in Africa 

[Dexter Morgan]

You know what the irony is in this?
Who started the widespead epidemic that is AIDS? Straight men and straight women.
Started in Africa in the 1930's orhaned baby monkeys valued by some african tribes were (if the were still suckling) nursed by african native women.
They often were infected and passed on the infection through the trasmission of bodily fluids namely blood and breast milk.
Back then the Aids virus had not transmuted.
Unfaithful husbands and some unfaithful women would have sex with locals from other tribes and so it progressed out towards the ports of Africa, in time. Now we are not talking Aids as we know it. But the virus evolved. By the time tourists and sailors bought home the gift of Aids from their time inport with local women, back home, Aids had started to takle its toll.
Come 1980's it was a nasty killing virus.
Why was it mainly in the gay and drug using communities? Well the sharing of needles and as one gay an said in a documentary. "Well we did not ever use condoms. I mean neither of us would get pregnant."
Aids history 101.
There is irony. Were it not for straight women and men not being able to keep their "affections" limited to their partners Aids would not have spread past the villages in Africa

Well then maybe it wouldn't have become an epidemic.  I really hope Tart and Hubert are trolling, because it is ridiculous how defensive they are about homosexuality.

[The_Chosen_One]

Point is, if everyone were gay, and I mean homosexual and not just happy, there would be a population implosion. Why? Gay couples would be forced to adopt, or go surrogate, and I don't think the laws have changed that much to allow gay couples the freedom to have children at the same rate as hetero couples.

And imagine if things got tighter, through the generations, we wouldn't have to worry about AIDS killing off people, it'd be our own sexuality that would do it.

Just sayin'.

[eris]

I have successfully masturbated to lesbian pornography. Am I gay ?

[The_Chosen_One]

I have successfully masturbated to lesbian pornography. Am I gay ?

Were you smiling?

[Squidusa]

Well then maybe it wouldn't have become an epidemic.  I really hope Tart and Hubert are trolling, because it is ridiculous how defensive they are about homosexuality.

I can't speak for Hubert on this but I found it pretty shocking how you actually still thought that old myth. 

['Butterflies']

Point is, if everyone were gay, and I mean homosexual and not just happy, there would be a population implosion. Why? Gay couples would be forced to adopt, or go surrogate, and I don't think the laws have changed that much to allow gay couples the freedom to have children at the same rate as hetero couples.

And imagine if things got tighter, through the generations, we wouldn't have to worry about AIDS killing off people, it'd be our own sexuality that would do it.

Just sayin'.

If the majority of people were gay, then it's unlikely that there would be any problems with allowing gays to adopt, as homosexuality would be the norm, rather than the exception.
If the majority of people were gay, then there would be far less accidental pregnancy, therefore far less children to adopt anyway.

It's pretty easy for gay people to have kids. If the majority were gay, it would become a lot easier. It would be as simple as a guy providing a woman with a sample of his man-juice.
People would not stop reproducing simply because they were gay.
The world is already overpopulated, and getting worse. If people had to go to the bother of setting up a surrogacy agreement, they are only likely to go to the bother if they really want a kid. Accidental pregnancy would almost cease to exist, and that would go a long way towards reversing the worlds problems with overpopulation.

[eris]

I have successfully masturbated to lesbian pornography. Am I gay ?

Were you smiling ?

I was making more of this face   

[midlifeaspie]

  I really hope Tart and Hubert are trolling, because it is ridiculous how defensive they are about homosexuality.

I have no idea who you are, as you haven't been active the entire time I have been here.  But I find it ridiculous how uneducated and backwards you are.

[The_Chosen_One]

Point is, if everyone were gay, and I mean homosexual and not just happy, there would be a population implosion. Why? Gay couples would be forced to adopt, or go surrogate, and I don't think the laws have changed that much to allow gay couples the freedom to have children at the same rate as hetero couples.

And imagine if things got tighter, through the generations, we wouldn't have to worry about AIDS killing off people, it'd be our own sexuality that would do it.

Just sayin'.

If the majority of people were gay, then it's unlikely that there would be any problems with allowing gays to adopt, as homosexuality would be the norm, rather than the exception.
If the majority of people were gay, then there would be far less accidental pregnancy, therefore far less children to adopt anyway.

It's pretty easy for gay people to have kids. If the majority were gay, it would become a lot easier. It would be as simple as a guy providing a woman with a sample of his man-juice.
People would not stop reproducing simply because they were gay.
The world is already overpopulated, and getting worse. If people had to go to the bother of setting up a surrogacy agreement, they are only likely to go to the bother if they really want a kid. Accidental pregnancy would almost cease to exist, and that would go a long way towards reversing the worlds problems with overpopulation.

Very good point on accidental births.

That was sort of my point, about population. Because there would be less liklihood of accidental and unwanted pregnancies, most (if not all) children born to gay parents (or adopted by gay parents) would be planned.

Yes, the norm. Only real problem is if the fundie Christians still had power in govt, as a lot of them still see homosexuality as the 'devil's work'.

Would be interesting times, indeed.

['Butterflies']

Point is, if everyone were gay, and I mean homosexual and not just happy, there would be a population implosion. Why? Gay couples would be forced to adopt, or go surrogate, and I don't think the laws have changed that much to allow gay couples the freedom to have children at the same rate as hetero couples.

And imagine if things got tighter, through the generations, we wouldn't have to worry about AIDS killing off people, it'd be our own sexuality that would do it.

Just sayin'.

If the majority of people were gay, then it's unlikely that there would be any problems with allowing gays to adopt, as homosexuality would be the norm, rather than the exception.
If the majority of people were gay, then there would be far less accidental pregnancy, therefore far less children to adopt anyway.

It's pretty easy for gay people to have kids. If the majority were gay, it would become a lot easier. It would be as simple as a guy providing a woman with a sample of his man-juice.
People would not stop reproducing simply because they were gay.
The world is already overpopulated, and getting worse. If people had to go to the bother of setting up a surrogacy agreement, they are only likely to go to the bother if they really want a kid. Accidental pregnancy would almost cease to exist, and that would go a long way towards reversing the worlds problems with overpopulation.

Very good point on accidental births.

That was sort of my point, about population. Because there would be less liklihood of accidental and unwanted pregnancies, most (if not all) children born to gay parents (or adopted by gay parents) would be planned.

Yes, the norm. Only real problem is if the fundie Christians still had power in govt, as a lot of them still see homosexuality as the 'devil's work'.

Would be interesting times, indeed.

But surely the majority of fundies would be gay as well, same with fundie Muslims. If they were almost all gay, then I'm sure they would quickly change their objections to it.