and rightly so, right?
But how are they THAT much more delusional than most other religious people?
obviously preaching that the world is gonna end tomorrow, today or yesterday is pretty insane, but then isn't it also pretty insane to believe there was some virgin who gave birth to some guy who could walk on water and came back from the dead blah blah blah...?
why do people treat most religious delusions as reasonable and respectable, yet the minority are ostracised?
Have often wondered the same thing.
Why is one set of beliefs seen as sensible, but another set of almost equally wacky beliefs seen as insane.
I think it's partly because the ancient stories cannot be disproven conclusively in our time. We may think it's highly unlikely/impossible
that a virgin was impregnated by a deity, or that a god-man rose from the dead to save all mankind, but we weren't there
thousands of years ago to witness the actual events that inspired the stories. On the other hand, if somebody declares that the Rapture
will occur on May 21, 2011, all we need do to prove him wrong is to wait till May 22. Maybe that's why there is more tolerance of
ancient myths than of modern "prophecies." Just a guess.