I'm in two minds about this.
On one hand , I am glad he's dead , he did deserve to die plus it may weaken Al Quaida temporarily.
On the other , they shouldn't have killed him straight away , I mean they could have interrogated the guy and found out more about the Al Quaida operations THEN execute him if they must.
Idk I just thnk there was information to be obtained from his capture rather than the gratification of his death. 
I believe the orders were bring him in alive if possible. The fact was that he resisted and there was a shoot out. Better to have killed him while getting an opportunity
than risk him loose another ten years. I wonder what will happen to the 25 million bounty that was on his head? will that go to whoever fired the shot?
True , but I can't shake the feeling that someone was a tad trigger happy.
*whispers to squiddeh...Americano's - they never slow on the trigger?
We're talking about SEAL Team Six here. They're the very best of the best, the most professional of the professional.
If it was possible to take him alive, he'd be alive today.
Considering he's been missing for 10 years and was responsible for 9/11 , I doubt that anyone would be able to resist just murdering him.
(I'm not blaming them of course , it's only fair they'd feel that.)
Idk , I can see why they killed him but I still stand by that he would have been more useful alive , then they could execute him.
