It doesn't get easier for me to consider such an inaccuracy when people like Rissy come here and basically say I'm trolling or disrespectful because my stance differs from theirs.
I never accused you of trolling and it's easy for personal stances and actions to be disrespectful. Do you not believe you are disrespectful?
I am sure he can be and i am sure he has been disrespectful on occasions on I2. I am sure the same could be said of everyone here. Specifically, and in this instance? I really don't think so.
In fact Odeon I think has been rather gentle with you too and more considerate and respectful than I thought he would be.
What you have got from everyone here in this thread and most others is respect and rather light banter by all and sundry. Were you expecting something else? What has Kayleigh been telling you about us?
I'm just saying that it isn't hard to be disrespectful, and that it's hardly a big claim to make. I'm not accusing him of being a terrible person.
What 'vanishing minority' do you speak of? And where is your proof that they're vanishing?
What has my lack of a career in language or science have to do with this discussion?
Godwin's Law is probably fun to throw around but it's still just a opinion of an individual. And it was applied here by your judgment. It's just a throw out. Still no relevance, but if you mean to say I'm bad arguer as a seperate criticism, go ahead and take it.
You're still mixing arguments though. The definitions you use are clear and unambiguous, but nature isn't. It's not my job or concern, but sticking with just the simple categories of male and female is lazy. I'm only mentioning it because it's a flaw in your excuse and argument.
Socially, the physical definitions are mostly useless and only apply to biology. And the arguments for the use pronouns and gender labels are in social terms. You ignore me when I say that the definitions aren't being changed. It's extra definitions and it doesn't interfere with the current definitions at all.
Your joking about the meaning of existence does not answer the question asked of you. Answer my question seriously. Biology explains how reproduction works, but does not prove or suggest any purpose for existence. I mean, people are compelled to reproduce but the activity of life is just activity.
I'm not Christian anyway, or religious. And this isn't discounting science facts. But how do you know what the meaning of existence is and that your perception of the world is genuine? I was portrayed here as having 'christian-like arguments' so I'm turning towards that topic. What makes your view better than anyone elses?
Oh and don't stroke your ego. I have always found science terms good for labelling physical things, I just find that culture is more than just cold science.