I did not make the claim that eating dogs is morally the same as that idiot slaughtering 100 dogs.
Of course not. You just stated the connection you made, which could be viewed as a moral one. Really, don't know the story of the guy with the dogs; just guessing it wasn't nice and not for food. So may have misunderstood a purely visceral reaction as something else.
What brought that comparison to mind was the number of dogs combined with the claim that many of these animals are family pets. "The dogs, many apparently stolen from their owners," did you miss that part?
Yes, missed. Stealing people's pets is another topic though and one which most agree, so not sure I would have touched on it anyway, but it does explain your connection well.
Where I did use the term bad conduct I was comparing eating oatmeal with eating dogs.
Not really sure what that means.