Under 40's thread

["couldbecousin"]

   I see Squid thinks he's going to place me in a HOME!  Well, that is not going to happen, you little punk! 

[Squidusa]

   I see Squid thinks he's going to place me in a HOME!  Well, that is not going to happen, you little punk! 

Poor grandma , she's so delusional I don't think she's capable of living at home independantly anymore . 



Wanna bet? 

["couldbecousin"]

   I see Squid thinks he's going to place me in a HOME!  Well, that is not going to happen, you little punk! 

Poor grandma , she's so delusional I don't think she's capable of living at home independantly anymore . 



Wanna bet? 

 I have lived on my own for many years and I do just fine!  Go vac your room before I take away your dongle!   

[eris]

Oh so I was right then, You are using that avatar to cause shit

Who are you talking to?

Monkey

you are talking to my cat ?

[midlifeaspie]

If she's underage, that's legally a bad thing no matter the intention. At least that's how the law is here (unless I got it wrong again).

Bare flesh does not equal pornography, in the US anyway.  Nudity does not equal pornography.  There is nothing sexually suggestive about that avatar.  I see plenty of immature breasts, and pre-pubescent genitals on several programs I watch on basic cable.  This one being the most obvious: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_%26_Olly:_Living_with_the_Tribes

I don't think anyone rational is accusing the Travel Channel of kiddie porn.

[Squidusa]

  I see Squid thinks he's going to place me in a HOME!  Well, that is not going to happen, you little punk!  

Poor grandma , she's so delusional I don't think she's capable of living at home independantly anymore .  



Wanna bet?  

 I have lived on my own for many years and I do just fine!  Go vac your room before I take away your dongle!  

Sexual Harrassment!

[Calavera]

If she's underage, that's legally a bad thing no matter the intention. At least that's how the law is here (unless I got it wrong again).

Bare flesh does not equal pornography, in the US anyway.  Nudity does not equal pornography.  There is nothing sexually suggestive about that avatar.  I see plenty of immature breasts, and pre-pubescent genitals on several programs I watch on basic cable.  This one being the most obvious: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_%26_Olly:_Living_with_the_Tribes

I don't think anyone rational is accusing the Travel Channel of kiddie porn.

I agree it's no kiddie porn.

But it seems like here in Australia, noticing pictures of a nude baby on a customer's computer can get you in trouble with the law. The one who told me that was probably exaggerating and being a drama queen, though.

[midlifeaspie]

If she's underage, that's legally a bad thing no matter the intention. At least that's how the law is here (unless I got it wrong again).

Bare flesh does not equal pornography, in the US anyway.  Nudity does not equal pornography.  There is nothing sexually suggestive about that avatar.  I see plenty of immature breasts, and pre-pubescent genitals on several programs I watch on basic cable.  This one being the most obvious: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_%26_Olly:_Living_with_the_Tribes

I don't think anyone rational is accusing the Travel Channel of kiddie porn.

I agree it's no kiddie porn.

But it seems like here in Australia, noticing pictures of a nude baby on a customer's computer can get you in trouble with the law. The one who told me that was probably exaggerating and being a drama queen, though.

That could be entirely true.  I have heard from others that Australia has a stricter view of sexual material than we do in the US, which I thought was odd as isn't prostitution legal in your country?

[Calavera]

That could be entirely true.  I have heard from others that Australia has a stricter view of sexual material than we do in the US, which I thought was odd as isn't prostitution legal in your country?

Yes, apparently prostitution is legal in all states (not just Victoria).

I think Australia is more concerned with child safety (combined with some paranoia) than with sex matters between adults.

Not that that is an entirely bad thing. Children do need to be protected (but not from imagined "threats").

[midlifeaspie]

That could be entirely true.  I have heard from others that Australia has a stricter view of sexual material than we do in the US, which I thought was odd as isn't prostitution legal in your country?

Yes, apparently prostitution is legal in all states (not just Victoria).

I think Australia is more concerned with child safety (combined with some paranoia) than with sex matters between adults.

Not that that is an entirely bad thing. Children do need to be protected (but not from imagined "threats").

[Callaway]

If she's underage, that's legally a bad thing no matter the intention. At least that's how the law is here (unless I got it wrong again).

Bare flesh does not equal pornography, in the US anyway.  Nudity does not equal pornography.  There is nothing sexually suggestive about that avatar.  I see plenty of immature breasts, and pre-pubescent genitals on several programs I watch on basic cable.  This one being the most obvious: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_%26_Olly:_Living_with_the_Tribes

I don't think anyone rational is accusing the Travel Channel of kiddie porn.

I agree it's no kiddie porn.

But it seems like here in Australia, noticing pictures of a nude baby on a customer's computer can get you in trouble with the law. The one who told me that was probably exaggerating and being a drama queen, though.

I would think that pictures of naked babies in the bath or pictures you could see in National Geographic Magazine wouldn't be considered pornographic here, but I don't know the laws in Australia.

[midlifeaspie]

Just because the old folks have abandoned their thread doesn't mean we whippersnappers should do the same 

[odeon]

I forgot about it. 

[Parts]

Yes under forty is a good thing I can't imagine finding anything much larger than theses 38DD being anymore fun

[Semicolon]

Yes under forty is a good thing I can't imagine finding anything much larger than theses 38DD being anymore fun

Can you pose the arms?