The right to bear arms

[odeon]

I'd say bombs would be more effective. The smartest move is to blow up things that would financially sting the rich shitfaces. That would bring them back down to earth and stop the brief powertripping.

They'd certainly be more effective, but they remain illegal for private citizens. Which was kind of my point because having a few small firearms wouldn't make much of a difference in the long run. Realistically a state will never make legal anything that would threaten their power.

O-man. With all due respect. If I was pissed off enough to go on a suicidal government-bombing spree of terror, I wouldn't be worried about whether it was legal or not man.  :lol:

Not saying I would go and do that either. Things would have to get pretty bad to piss me off that much.

I know you wouldn't bother about the legal matters, rage, and that wasn't my point. The point is that making such weapons legal would create a very dangerous situation, one that the state couldn't control. As things stand now, if a nutjob like Lit gets hold of a gun, he's most likely not clever enough to hide it in the long run IF he attempts to use it, and the state will be able to act.

Obviously, anyone could go on a one-man bombing-spree but the likelihood is that they will get caught.

[odeon]

I'd say bombs would be more effective. The smartest move is to blow up things that would financially sting the rich shitfaces. That would bring them back down to earth and stop the brief powertripping.

They'd certainly be more effective, but they remain illegal for private citizens. Which was kind of my point because having a few small firearms wouldn't make much of a difference in the long run. Realistically a state will never make legal anything that would threaten their power.

You can make bombs from stuff that's still legal even in Sweden, just for your information. Anyone able to bake a cake can make a bomb.

For your information, I know how to make a bomb.

 

You forget my background.

[TheoK]

I know you wouldn't bother about the legal matters, rage, and that wasn't my point. The point is that making such weapons legal would create a very dangerous situation, one that the state couldn't control. As things stand now, if a nutjob like Lit gets hold of a gun, he's most likely not clever enough to hide it in the long run IF he attempts to use it, and the state will be able to act.

Obviously, anyone could go on a one-man bombing-spree but the likelihood is that they will get caught.

It's probably not hard to avoid getting caught in Sweden, except when the mission is completed.

[RageBeoulve]

I'd say bombs would be more effective. The smartest move is to blow up things that would financially sting the rich shitfaces. That would bring them back down to earth and stop the brief powertripping.

They'd certainly be more effective, but they remain illegal for private citizens. Which was kind of my point because having a few small firearms wouldn't make much of a difference in the long run. Realistically a state will never make legal anything that would threaten their power.

O-man. With all due respect. If I was pissed off enough to go on a suicidal government-bombing spree of terror, I wouldn't be worried about whether it was legal or not man.  :lol:

Not saying I would go and do that either. Things would have to get pretty bad to piss me off that much.

I know you wouldn't bother about the legal matters, rage, and that wasn't my point. The point is that making such weapons legal would create a very dangerous situation, one that the state couldn't control. As things stand now, if a nutjob like Lit gets hold of a gun, he's most likely not clever enough to hide it in the long run IF he attempts to use it, and the state will be able to act.

Obviously, anyone could go on a one-man bombing-spree but the likelihood is that they will get caught.

Yeah pretty much. Lit is basically on the right track in my opinion. I think he's too focused on the killing of people part though.

And yeah if I was going on a mission to snap the government and their rich ass bosses back into reality, I wouldn't plan to live through it. I'd go out with a big bang, so to speak. And I would definetely remind them that they live in a world with billions of other people and they'd best not get carried away with the self-serving bullshit.

[odeon]

But would you actually do it?

[RageBeoulve]

Yes. If things really were taken that far, I would, and so would hundreds of other americans.

Thats the only thing that keeps the fatcats from clamping down. They don't want to piss on a hornet's nest.

[Parts]

I'd say bombs would be more effective. The smartest move is to blow up things that would financially sting the rich shitfaces. That would bring them back down to earth and stop the brief powertripping.

They'd certainly be more effective, but they remain illegal for private citizens. Which was kind of my point because having a few small firearms wouldn't make much of a difference in the long run. Realistically a state will never make legal anything that would threaten their power.

You haven't seen the arsenals people have here.  My brothers for example have Gun vaults the size of closets

[TheoK]

I'd say bombs would be more effective. The smartest move is to blow up things that would financially sting the rich shitfaces. That would bring them back down to earth and stop the brief powertripping.

They'd certainly be more effective, but they remain illegal for private citizens. Which was kind of my point because having a few small firearms wouldn't make much of a difference in the long run. Realistically a state will never make legal anything that would threaten their power.

You haven't seen the arsenals people have here.  My brothers for example have Gun vaults the size of closets

You're brave. Not like the cowards in Europe. 

[DirtDawg]

I'd say bombs would be more effective. The smartest move is to blow up things that would financially sting the rich shitfaces. That would bring them back down to earth and stop the brief powertripping.

They'd certainly be more effective, but they remain illegal for private citizens. Which was kind of my point because having a few small firearms wouldn't make much of a difference in the long run. Realistically a state will never make legal anything that would threaten their power.

You haven't seen the arsenals people have here.  My brothers for example have Gun vaults the size of closets

... as does my brother, half of my forty seven grown-up cousins and myself, too.  (My vault is not as big as a closet, actually - it fits inside the closet)

[Christopher McCandless]

I'd say bombs would be more effective. The smartest move is to blow up things that would financially sting the rich shitfaces. That would bring them back down to earth and stop the brief powertripping.

They'd certainly be more effective, but they remain illegal for private citizens. Which was kind of my point because having a few small firearms wouldn't make much of a difference in the long run. Realistically a state will never make legal anything that would threaten their power.

O-man. With all due respect. If I was pissed off enough to go on a suicidal government-bombing spree of terror, I wouldn't be worried about whether it was legal or not man.  :lol:

Not saying I would go and do that either. Things would have to get pretty bad to piss me off that much.

I know you wouldn't bother about the legal matters, rage, and that wasn't my point. The point is that making such weapons legal would create a very dangerous situation, one that the state couldn't control. As things stand now, if a nutjob like Lit gets hold of a gun, he's most likely not clever enough to hide it in the long run IF he attempts to use it, and the state will be able to act.

Obviously, anyone could go on a one-man bombing-spree but the likelihood is that they will get caught.

Remote bombs are far more effective, especially if you want to avoid getting caught.

[TheoK]

I just read that bullet proof vests need a license too here(!!!) I hate this country to my bones.

[Christopher McCandless]

I just read that bullet proof vests need a license too here(!!!) I hate this country to my bones.

Just wear two "stab-proof" vests instead, they would have the similar amount of Kevlar in.

[DirtDawg]

I just read that bullet proof vests need a license too here(!!!) I hate this country to my bones.

Just wear two "stab-proof" vests instead, they would have the similar amount of Kevlar in.

Uhm, learn a bit more about penetration, pal.

[odeon]

I'd say bombs would be more effective. The smartest move is to blow up things that would financially sting the rich shitfaces. That would bring them back down to earth and stop the brief powertripping.

They'd certainly be more effective, but they remain illegal for private citizens. Which was kind of my point because having a few small firearms wouldn't make much of a difference in the long run. Realistically a state will never make legal anything that would threaten their power.

You haven't seen the arsenals people have here.  My brothers for example have Gun vaults the size of closets

I suspect it wouldn't defeat my point. The state's arsenal is a bit larger.

[TheoK]

I just read that bullet proof vests need a license too here(!!!) I hate this country to my bones.

Just wear two "stab-proof" vests instead, they would have the similar amount of Kevlar in.

Don't think it'd help. And even odeon will agree that there is absolutely no reason for licensing bullet proof vests. Though it didn't help the little piggie that got 7 bullets from Lars Widerström's gun in him.