I'd say bombs would be more effective. The smartest move is to blow up things that would financially sting the rich shitfaces. That would bring them back down to earth and stop the brief powertripping.
They'd certainly be more effective, but they remain illegal for private citizens. Which was kind of my point because having a few small firearms wouldn't make much of a difference in the long run. Realistically a state will never make legal anything that would threaten their power.
O-man. With all due respect. If I was pissed off enough to go on a suicidal government-bombing spree of terror, I wouldn't be worried about whether it was legal or not man. :lol:
Not saying I would go and do that either. Things would have to get pretty bad to piss me off that much.
I know you wouldn't bother about the legal matters, rage, and that wasn't my point. The point is that making such weapons legal would create a very dangerous situation, one that the state couldn't control. As things stand now, if a nutjob like Lit gets hold of a gun, he's most likely not clever enough to hide it in the long run IF he attempts to use it, and the state will be able to act.
Obviously, anyone could go on a one-man bombing-spree but the likelihood is that they will get caught.