Actually, I’ve just finished Leviticus.
The studies to which I made reference are not a part of any commonly accepted Bible, but rather considered as a part of the Apocrypha and not accteped as "Holy" by Semite nor Gentile.
I know all versions of history are edited and most often, widely accepted historical accounts are only included in Scripture if those writings lead to success in attempts to create a specific cultural following.
Most who have studied the works of the Apocrapha find them just as mystical as most of the Biblical chapters. We each take meaning from them based upon how they sync with our own experiences, just like with the accepted Holy Scriptures.
How does the Apocrypha influence your views of the Bible, out of curiosity?
I feel the Apocrypha works I have found access to simply complete my understanding of some of the history.
Understanding that these people were extremely paranoid and superstitious. Almost anything could be interpretted as a message from God.
I tend to wait for a second message.
As I understand it, the bible as we know it was largely committee work. What was included and what was left out was highly subjective and basically the result of the strongest wills prevailing. This was hundreds of years after the supposed events and nobody knew what actually took place.
This describes exactly the main reason for reading all of the ancient scriptures, if so inclined. Not to aid in conclusions, but to better understand the "politics" or prevailing wills that held such sway over the future of this type of religion.
Reading all I could find was one way I came out from under the overtly Christianist teachings and diatribes I was raised with as "truth."
I do believe that many of the messages from certain scriptures are valid, but I also enjoyed Tolkien, Asimov, Herbert, P.K. Dick, Niven, Zelazny and so many others. Not even beginning yet with the classics I have read and adore.