There is a looney on this forum.... and the looney on this forum is the one who is reading this post.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: hykeaswell on February 02, 2011, 10:34:39 AMEvery government that wants to have oppressing power needs some handy offences to get people convicted randomly. This would be a good catch all.
Every government that wants to have oppressing power needs some handy offences to get people convicted randomly.
Quote from: couldbecousin on February 02, 2011, 09:52:25 AMQuote from: PPK on February 02, 2011, 09:51:00 AMQuote from: bodaccea on February 02, 2011, 08:34:35 AMpeople say the punishment should fit the crime, what would be the appropriate punishment for this? and should the penalties get 'stiffer' Like a shart? Definitely throw the book at sharters, those are potentially visually offensive in addition to the olfactory trauma!
Quote from: PPK on February 02, 2011, 09:51:00 AMQuote from: bodaccea on February 02, 2011, 08:34:35 AMpeople say the punishment should fit the crime, what would be the appropriate punishment for this? and should the penalties get 'stiffer' Like a shart? Definitely throw the book at sharters, those are potentially visually offensive in addition to the olfactory trauma!
Quote from: bodaccea on February 02, 2011, 08:34:35 AMpeople say the punishment should fit the crime, what would be the appropriate punishment for this? and should the penalties get 'stiffer' Like a shart?
people say the punishment should fit the crime, what would be the appropriate punishment for this? and should the penalties get 'stiffer'
Quote from: PPK on February 02, 2011, 09:57:26 AMQuote from: couldbecousin on February 02, 2011, 09:52:25 AMQuote from: PPK on February 02, 2011, 09:51:00 AMQuote from: bodaccea on February 02, 2011, 08:34:35 AMpeople say the punishment should fit the crime, what would be the appropriate punishment for this? and should the penalties get 'stiffer' Like a shart? Definitely throw the book at sharters, those are potentially visually offensive in addition to the olfactory trauma! hahahaaaaaaaaaa w the hands on the waist all oblivious and proud and peppy :D:D
Quote from: ZEGH8578 on February 02, 2011, 11:29:59 AMQuote from: PPK on February 02, 2011, 09:57:26 AMQuote from: couldbecousin on February 02, 2011, 09:52:25 AMQuote from: PPK on February 02, 2011, 09:51:00 AMQuote from: bodaccea on February 02, 2011, 08:34:35 AMpeople say the punishment should fit the crime, what would be the appropriate punishment for this? and should the penalties get 'stiffer' Like a shart? Definitely throw the book at sharters, those are potentially visually offensive in addition to the olfactory trauma! hahahaaaaaaaaaa w the hands on the waist all oblivious and proud and peppy :D:DSo proud of his white pants too!
Quote from: couldbecousin on February 02, 2011, 11:32:02 AMQuote from: ZEGH8578 on February 02, 2011, 11:29:59 AMQuote from: PPK on February 02, 2011, 09:57:26 AMQuote from: couldbecousin on February 02, 2011, 09:52:25 AMQuote from: PPK on February 02, 2011, 09:51:00 AMQuote from: bodaccea on February 02, 2011, 08:34:35 AMpeople say the punishment should fit the crime, what would be the appropriate punishment for this? and should the penalties get 'stiffer' Like a shart? Definitely throw the book at sharters, those are potentially visually offensive in addition to the olfactory trauma! hahahaaaaaaaaaa w the hands on the waist all oblivious and proud and peppy :D:DSo proud of his white pants too! poor bloke probably just sat on some gateaux
you never know
Quote from: ZEGH8578 on February 02, 2011, 11:47:29 AMyou never know That's gross.
What's funny to me was how quickly everyone else got out of the hot tub.
Quote from: Callaway on February 02, 2011, 12:34:40 PMWhat's funny to me was how quickly everyone else got out of the hot tub.Yeah, I would have to take a shower after that. :lol:
