Tomorrow is the Great Day! (For Sudan!)

[Scrapheap]

my point was, had we followed the american recipe, we would probably be invading... morocco and egypt? maybe greece, and italy! theyre close too!

So what's your recipe  oh gourmet of the worlds problems

This aught to be enlightening.   

[ZEGH8578]

my point was, had we followed the american recipe, we would probably be invading... morocco and egypt? maybe greece, and italy! theyre close too!

So what's your recipe  oh gourmet of the worlds problems

This aught to be enlightening.    

learn to spell, moron :]

as for my reply, its on the previous page.

[Parts]

Then why not nuke them like soph said? 

[ZEGH8578]

Then why not nuke them like soph said? 

then why not nuke us? why not nuke everyone. why nuke anybody......

i explained even that, nuking someone isnt like pressing some delete button. nuking them only creates a continent full of people and cancer, that we'd be even more responsible to fix.

i find that ignorant and generalistic, to "nuke them all".
we need africa _as it is_ in the west, thats my point.
we need them to remain poor.
but people are bleeding hearts.
so in order to keep africa poor, and keep people from protesting back home, we let people send aid-money, to feel better about africa being a shithole.

i dont get the mentality of nuking them. homeless people are useless. do you go around shooting every homeless people you find? or radiating them w nuclear waste? it makes no sense.

[Parts]

Then why not nuke them like soph said? 

then why not nuke us? why not nuke everyone. why nuke anybody......

i explained even that, nuking someone isnt like pressing some delete button. nuking them only creates a continent full of people and cancer, that we'd be even more responsible to fix.

i find that ignorant and generalistic, to "nuke them all".
we need africa _as it is_ in the west, thats my point.
we need them to remain poor.
but people are bleeding hearts.
so in order to keep africa poor, and keep people from protesting back home, we let people send aid-money, to feel better about africa being a shithole.

i dont get the mentality of nuking them. homeless people are useless. do you go around shooting every homeless people you find? or radiating them w nuclear waste? it makes no sense.

You want on the list too then

Then why the fuss about Sudan heart bleeding some?

[Scrapheap]

So what's your recipe  oh gourmet of the worlds problems

This aught to be enlightening.    

learn to spell, moron :]

aught is an archaic spelling, moron :]

as for my reply, its on the previous page.

So your "solution" is to allow the very thing that you Ooh-so sanctimoniously denounced the US for doing.

Hooray for moral hypocricy!!!          

[ZEGH8578]

Then why not nuke them like soph said? 

then why not nuke us? why not nuke everyone. why nuke anybody......

i explained even that, nuking someone isnt like pressing some delete button. nuking them only creates a continent full of people and cancer, that we'd be even more responsible to fix.

i find that ignorant and generalistic, to "nuke them all".
we need africa _as it is_ in the west, thats my point.
we need them to remain poor.
but people are bleeding hearts.
so in order to keep africa poor, and keep people from protesting back home, we let people send aid-money, to feel better about africa being a shithole.

i dont get the mentality of nuking them. homeless people are useless. do you go around shooting every homeless people you find? or radiating them w nuclear waste? it makes no sense.

You want on the list too then

Then why the fuss about Sudan heart bleeding some?

i am allowed to observe and react to what i see in the world, without being obliged to offer a solution, no?

i wanna ask everyone who gets all "get off your ass and do something about it" if they approve of rape and genocide, since theyre not running around "doing something about it"

i observe, and i react, but there is no solution. i cant offer any, because there is none.
the only solution is to let nature run its course, NOW, IN THE MEANTIME, we dont HAVE TO torture as much as possible. if you get my drift.
i guess its a common-sense thing...

[ZEGH8578]

So what's your recipe  oh gourmet of the worlds problems

This aught to be enlightening.    

learn to spell, moron :]

aught is an archaic spelling, moron :]

as for my reply, its on the previous page.

So your "solution" is to allow the very thing that you Ooh-so sanctimoniously denounced the US for doing.

Hooray for moral hypocricy!!!         
[/quote]

you offer _absolutely nothing_, except for feeble attempts at my credibility.
your like a 12 year old. get a fucking life, you fag.

[Osensitive1]

Aught means zero.

[Scrapheap]

you offer _absolutely nothing_, except for feeble attempts at my credibility.
your like a 12 year old. get a fucking life, you fag.

IRONY!!!!!!!!!!

[ZEGH8578]

you offer _absolutely nothing_, except for feeble attempts at my credibility.
your like a 12 year old. get a fucking life, you fag.

IRONY!!!!!!!!!!

go have a 3-some w GR and richard. "irony" my ass, thats just another one of your pathetic little "escapes".
you suck. you couldnt "pwn" someone if your life depended on it.
in case you didnt know, the whole "haha, i laugh at you!" thing has been debunked since its first use in the early bronze age sometime.

[Scrapheap]

Yes, of course! That's what early Bronze Age philosophers did!

They tackled the all-important "haha, I laugh at you" argument. 

You're an astute student of history Zegh. 

[ZEGH8578]

Yes, of course! That's what early Bronze Age philosophers did!

They tackled the all-important "haha, I laugh at you" argument. 

You're an astute student of history Zegh. 

your doing it again. idiot.

[Scrapheap]

Yes, of course! That's what early Bronze Age philosophers did!

They tackled the all-important "haha, I laugh at you" argument. 

You're an astute student of history Zegh. 

your doing it again. idiot.

It's you're, not your.

Learn to spell, moron :]

[ZEGH8578]

Yes, of course! That's what early Bronze Age philosophers did!

They tackled the all-important "haha, I laugh at you" argument. 

You're an astute student of history Zegh. 

your doing it again. idiot.

It's you're, not your.

Learn to spell, moron :]

"oh snap"
i know its "you're" i just dont care enough. didnt you notice i also skip capital letters after periods? can you really not come up with anything better?

does it make you proud, to be so similar to richard? was that a goal of yours all along, sortof like GR and sol? do you have a conspitated face as well?