If I got rid of everything that didn't "spark joy"...I'd be on the side of the road with the cat and my coffee maker.
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Sadly I agree with a lot of what she says.Maybe if you didn't act like a complete eejit after being criticized for it, maybe you two would still be friends.
Quote from: Butterflies on October 11, 2010, 08:13:45 PMQuote from: Steve-O on October 11, 2010, 08:01:03 PMQuote from: Butterflies on October 11, 2010, 07:53:41 PMQuote from: Steve-O on October 11, 2010, 07:48:19 PMQuote from: Butterflies on October 11, 2010, 07:42:20 PMQuote from: Kit on October 11, 2010, 07:37:34 PMIt sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking. It does. Sarcasm never seems to work when you're writing on the internet . Thing is, when I wrote it I still liked Rage and would have been totally against the idea of banning him if it had been a serious suggestion.Some of my sarcasm has fallen foul when some some people didn't understand it. I think most people here have gotten my jokes OK, but there could be some exceptions.I thought most knew, at least by now that it had been a joke. I think Rage just wants to sulk, and I didn't like DDs responses to Weakling, Soph or myself one bit.DD can definitely be hard to read. The whole situation seems to have been blown out of proportion, I think. If you want proof that someone is having a hard time moving on, check Scrapheap.The banning thing has been blown out of all proportion, up untill today Rage was one of the folk on the site that I liked. I'm not bothered about the DD thing though. I couldn't care less about him, and never liked him to begin with, and I'd imagine he feels the same way about me.Yeah, the situation with you and Scrapheap does seem to be getting a bit out of control. I'm fairly newish around here, and I don't use WP, so I obviously don't know the history behind things. I hope the pair of you can sort it out. Even if you can't stand each other, it might be a good idea if you can both find a way to stop this.I don't like you either. Let me show you what I see. This is why I think you're a petty bitch.Quote from: Butterflies on October 07, 2010, 06:23:08 PMQuote from: Weakling on October 07, 2010, 06:21:44 PMI propose an automatic temporary ban of 1 week for anyone who posts a picture, smiley, space, etc. that goes on for more than 3 lines. I couldn't agree more. That bugged hell out of me today.^Truth.Quote from: Butterflies on October 11, 2010, 07:28:25 PMThe banning Rage thing was a joke, and I'd already said it was at that point. I think DD was hugely overreacting to something that was only a joke.^Lie.Furthermore, and even more irritating....Quote from: Butterflies on October 09, 2010, 09:34:34 AMQuote from: PPK on October 09, 2010, 09:27:33 AMQuote from: Mudkipz on October 09, 2010, 09:17:30 AMModulators, why are you defending Meadow the dragon, while black knights like me and Rage are trying to slay her?What you and Rage are doing by posting lots of retarded images is done with the intent of preventing others from posting in this thread. How does that conform to this? http://www.intensitysquared.com/ You want to determine what threads we can post in?I agree. I've always liked Rage, but his wallpapering is pathetic, and I think it smacks of control freakery by trying to stop other people using a thread because he disapproves of it. He doesn't need to read it or be involved in it but he should grow the fuck up and let other people make up their own minds as to what threads they want to read, or contribute to.And yet short while later...Quote from: Butterflies on October 09, 2010, 08:32:34 PMI'm going to flush out the shoutbox so that at least she doesn't get the satisfaction of seeing that. Could we avoid arguing about this where she can see please.Quote but his wallpapering is pathetic, and I think it smacks of control freakery by trying to stop other people using a thread because he disapproves of itQuoteI'm going to flush out the shoutbox so that at least she doesn't get the satisfaction of seeing that. Could we avoid arguing about this where she can see please.Now see what I see, and see why I am so angry with you. You're dishonest.
Quote from: Steve-O on October 11, 2010, 08:01:03 PMQuote from: Butterflies on October 11, 2010, 07:53:41 PMQuote from: Steve-O on October 11, 2010, 07:48:19 PMQuote from: Butterflies on October 11, 2010, 07:42:20 PMQuote from: Kit on October 11, 2010, 07:37:34 PMIt sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking. It does. Sarcasm never seems to work when you're writing on the internet . Thing is, when I wrote it I still liked Rage and would have been totally against the idea of banning him if it had been a serious suggestion.Some of my sarcasm has fallen foul when some some people didn't understand it. I think most people here have gotten my jokes OK, but there could be some exceptions.I thought most knew, at least by now that it had been a joke. I think Rage just wants to sulk, and I didn't like DDs responses to Weakling, Soph or myself one bit.DD can definitely be hard to read. The whole situation seems to have been blown out of proportion, I think. If you want proof that someone is having a hard time moving on, check Scrapheap.The banning thing has been blown out of all proportion, up untill today Rage was one of the folk on the site that I liked. I'm not bothered about the DD thing though. I couldn't care less about him, and never liked him to begin with, and I'd imagine he feels the same way about me.Yeah, the situation with you and Scrapheap does seem to be getting a bit out of control. I'm fairly newish around here, and I don't use WP, so I obviously don't know the history behind things. I hope the pair of you can sort it out. Even if you can't stand each other, it might be a good idea if you can both find a way to stop this.
Quote from: Butterflies on October 11, 2010, 07:53:41 PMQuote from: Steve-O on October 11, 2010, 07:48:19 PMQuote from: Butterflies on October 11, 2010, 07:42:20 PMQuote from: Kit on October 11, 2010, 07:37:34 PMIt sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking. It does. Sarcasm never seems to work when you're writing on the internet . Thing is, when I wrote it I still liked Rage and would have been totally against the idea of banning him if it had been a serious suggestion.Some of my sarcasm has fallen foul when some some people didn't understand it. I think most people here have gotten my jokes OK, but there could be some exceptions.I thought most knew, at least by now that it had been a joke. I think Rage just wants to sulk, and I didn't like DDs responses to Weakling, Soph or myself one bit.DD can definitely be hard to read. The whole situation seems to have been blown out of proportion, I think. If you want proof that someone is having a hard time moving on, check Scrapheap.
Quote from: Steve-O on October 11, 2010, 07:48:19 PMQuote from: Butterflies on October 11, 2010, 07:42:20 PMQuote from: Kit on October 11, 2010, 07:37:34 PMIt sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking. It does. Sarcasm never seems to work when you're writing on the internet . Thing is, when I wrote it I still liked Rage and would have been totally against the idea of banning him if it had been a serious suggestion.Some of my sarcasm has fallen foul when some some people didn't understand it. I think most people here have gotten my jokes OK, but there could be some exceptions.I thought most knew, at least by now that it had been a joke. I think Rage just wants to sulk, and I didn't like DDs responses to Weakling, Soph or myself one bit.
Quote from: Butterflies on October 11, 2010, 07:42:20 PMQuote from: Kit on October 11, 2010, 07:37:34 PMIt sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking. It does. Sarcasm never seems to work when you're writing on the internet . Thing is, when I wrote it I still liked Rage and would have been totally against the idea of banning him if it had been a serious suggestion.Some of my sarcasm has fallen foul when some some people didn't understand it. I think most people here have gotten my jokes OK, but there could be some exceptions.
Quote from: Kit on October 11, 2010, 07:37:34 PMIt sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking. It does. Sarcasm never seems to work when you're writing on the internet . Thing is, when I wrote it I still liked Rage and would have been totally against the idea of banning him if it had been a serious suggestion.
It sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking.
Quote from: Weakling on October 07, 2010, 06:21:44 PMI propose an automatic temporary ban of 1 week for anyone who posts a picture, smiley, space, etc. that goes on for more than 3 lines. I couldn't agree more. That bugged hell out of me today.
I propose an automatic temporary ban of 1 week for anyone who posts a picture, smiley, space, etc. that goes on for more than 3 lines.
The banning Rage thing was a joke, and I'd already said it was at that point. I think DD was hugely overreacting to something that was only a joke.
Quote from: PPK on October 09, 2010, 09:27:33 AMQuote from: Mudkipz on October 09, 2010, 09:17:30 AMModulators, why are you defending Meadow the dragon, while black knights like me and Rage are trying to slay her?What you and Rage are doing by posting lots of retarded images is done with the intent of preventing others from posting in this thread. How does that conform to this? http://www.intensitysquared.com/ You want to determine what threads we can post in?I agree. I've always liked Rage, but his wallpapering is pathetic, and I think it smacks of control freakery by trying to stop other people using a thread because he disapproves of it. He doesn't need to read it or be involved in it but he should grow the fuck up and let other people make up their own minds as to what threads they want to read, or contribute to.
Quote from: Mudkipz on October 09, 2010, 09:17:30 AMModulators, why are you defending Meadow the dragon, while black knights like me and Rage are trying to slay her?What you and Rage are doing by posting lots of retarded images is done with the intent of preventing others from posting in this thread. How does that conform to this? http://www.intensitysquared.com/ You want to determine what threads we can post in?
Modulators, why are you defending Meadow the dragon, while black knights like me and Rage are trying to slay her?
I'm going to flush out the shoutbox so that at least she doesn't get the satisfaction of seeing that. Could we avoid arguing about this where she can see please.
but his wallpapering is pathetic, and I think it smacks of control freakery by trying to stop other people using a thread because he disapproves of it
If you can't see it, then I have nothing else to say.
I think he means where u said to Weakling "I couldn't agree more" after she said to ban. It looks like you're saying to ban him and then saying you didn'tI don't think you are being dishnonest btw- just that that is probably the bit he means
YUeah I know you didn't want him banned really - I don';t think anyone did tbh, except maybe Weakling lol
maybe this is all just a big aspie fuck-up - everyone seems to be misunderstanding everyone else
