It is interesting how you completely ignore my points re doing things for *others*.
I don't do things for others. I have no moral obligation to do that. I just don't purposely cause others harm, which is the only moral obligation to others there could ever be.
So which parts of my posts do you not understand?
Accidentally being thrown out of a car when not wearing a seat belt is not to
purposely cause others harm, since no one of course purposely is thrown out of a car, if they don't commit suicide that way, though then usually they drive into the front of a truck or a rock.
Bans and restrictions on things that
might cause harm can and are being used to "justify" every freedom being taken away from you. Otherwise you might as well ban tooth picks, since they can actually be used for picking peoples' eyes out. Not that that happens often, but it's quite
possible and has most probably happened on a few occasions.
In fact, surveilling all internet users and all phone calls abroad was "justified" with the "argument" that some of all internet users and people making phone calls to other countries
might be terrorists, remember? Same twisted thinking. Treat everyone as if they were criminals, because some of them are. Never mind that 99.99% are not or that the Western main principle of justice since the Romans was that everyone is innocent until proven guilty.