You call it OCD...I call it put the d*mn thing back where it belongs.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: odeon on November 03, 2009, 01:27:31 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 03, 2009, 07:27:13 AMQuote from: odeon on November 03, 2009, 02:48:32 AMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 06:56:38 PMQuote from: Singularity on November 02, 2009, 06:20:05 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 05:41:47 PMSometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action. True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so. It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that. And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...Post nudes in the newsbox?Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.Something on those lines, yes. But you really do show yourself up as easy to antagonise.
Quote from: Christopher McCandless on November 03, 2009, 07:27:13 AMQuote from: odeon on November 03, 2009, 02:48:32 AMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 06:56:38 PMQuote from: Singularity on November 02, 2009, 06:20:05 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 05:41:47 PMSometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action. True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so. It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that. And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...Post nudes in the newsbox?Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.
Quote from: odeon on November 03, 2009, 02:48:32 AMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 06:56:38 PMQuote from: Singularity on November 02, 2009, 06:20:05 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 05:41:47 PMSometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action. True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so. It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that. And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...
Quote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 06:56:38 PMQuote from: Singularity on November 02, 2009, 06:20:05 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 05:41:47 PMSometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action. True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so. It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that. And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?
Quote from: Singularity on November 02, 2009, 06:20:05 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 05:41:47 PMSometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action. True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so.
Quote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 05:41:47 PMSometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action. True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.
Quote from: Christopher McCandless on November 03, 2009, 08:30:07 PMQuote from: odeon on November 03, 2009, 01:27:31 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 03, 2009, 07:27:13 AMQuote from: odeon on November 03, 2009, 02:48:32 AMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 06:56:38 PMQuote from: Singularity on November 02, 2009, 06:20:05 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 05:41:47 PMSometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action. True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so. It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that. And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...Post nudes in the newsbox?Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.Something on those lines, yes. But you really do show yourself up as easy to antagonise. You really are ignorant, aren't you?
While you obviously have the right to your opinion--even the more moronic ones--you'll simply have to live with the fact that this site is not run according to your ideas. Not now, not ever.
Quote from: odeon on November 04, 2009, 09:01:28 AMWhile you obviously have the right to your opinion--even the more moronic ones--you'll simply have to live with the fact that this site is not run according to your ideas. Not now, not ever. Some people have left because of your ideas - bear that in mind.
Quote from: odeon on November 04, 2009, 08:39:32 AMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 03, 2009, 08:30:07 PMQuote from: odeon on November 03, 2009, 01:27:31 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 03, 2009, 07:27:13 AMQuote from: odeon on November 03, 2009, 02:48:32 AMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 06:56:38 PMQuote from: Singularity on November 02, 2009, 06:20:05 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 05:41:47 PMSometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action. True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so. It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that. And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...Post nudes in the newsbox?Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.Something on those lines, yes. But you really do show yourself up as easy to antagonise. You really are ignorant, aren't you?It is true - face it. You need to learn to keep your cool rather than exploding over small pranks. This site has had far worse in the past. Lighten up.
Alex179: Everything that is living is dying. It will stop dying when it is dead.
Quote from: Christopher McCandless on November 04, 2009, 08:43:04 AMQuote from: odeon on November 04, 2009, 08:39:32 AMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 03, 2009, 08:30:07 PMQuote from: odeon on November 03, 2009, 01:27:31 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 03, 2009, 07:27:13 AMQuote from: odeon on November 03, 2009, 02:48:32 AMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 06:56:38 PMQuote from: Singularity on November 02, 2009, 06:20:05 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 05:41:47 PMSometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action. True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so. It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that. And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...Post nudes in the newsbox?Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.Something on those lines, yes. But you really do show yourself up as easy to antagonise. You really are ignorant, aren't you?It is true - face it. You need to learn to keep your cool rather than exploding over small pranks. This site has had far worse in the past. Lighten up. I am just wondering abstractly, if this site WAS closed down because Odeon did not react and "kept his cool", who would you be having this conversation with and/or what would you be doing by way of congratulating Odeon for not being so "petty".
Quote from: Sir_Les_Patterson on November 05, 2009, 05:12:06 AMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 04, 2009, 08:43:04 AMQuote from: odeon on November 04, 2009, 08:39:32 AMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 03, 2009, 08:30:07 PMQuote from: odeon on November 03, 2009, 01:27:31 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 03, 2009, 07:27:13 AMQuote from: odeon on November 03, 2009, 02:48:32 AMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 06:56:38 PMQuote from: Singularity on November 02, 2009, 06:20:05 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 05:41:47 PMSometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action. True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so. It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that. And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...Post nudes in the newsbox?Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.Something on those lines, yes. But you really do show yourself up as easy to antagonise. You really are ignorant, aren't you?It is true - face it. You need to learn to keep your cool rather than exploding over small pranks. This site has had far worse in the past. Lighten up. I am just wondering abstractly, if this site WAS closed down because Odeon did not react and "kept his cool", who would you be having this conversation with and/or what would you be doing by way of congratulating Odeon for not being so "petty".He'd put in a good word for me elsewhere.
I like turtles!!
it is well known that PMS Elle is evil.
I think you'd fit in a 12" or at least a 16" firework mortar
You win this thread because that's most unsettling to even think about.