Soy was Bint

[GalileoAce]

[Callaway]

Callaway is a big self-righteous whiner. He never meant anything he said, I know that for sure.

Soy was banned for threatening the site.

I don't see where I have whined about this.  I understand that Soy is your friend and that you brought him here so you feel you need to defend him, but still I wonder how you would feel if he had started a thread saying that your mother should have hooks in her vagina attached to nylon ropes and then be dropped off a high bridge?

[TheoK]

I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.

[Phlexor]

I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.

That's because you are a fuckhead.

[TheoK]

I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.

That's because you are a fuckhead.

No, that's because I'm not a whiner.

[GalileoAce]

I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.

That's because you are a fuckhead.

No, that's because I'm not a whiner.

And yet...oddly enough, you seem to be whining now though...

[TheoK]

 

[ProfessorFarnsworth]

I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.

That's because you are a fuckhead.

I actually agree with Lit here though; because regardless even if his remarks were serious, you cannot let yourself get too seriously agitated by them. Composure is key.

[odeon]

He's a good person, yes, if you treat him the right way.

He got treated the way he treats others.

[odeon]

Yes, I read it, and he didn't mean it. Whiner.

So what should we have done, in your opinion? Give him a hug and thank him for attacking someone who's got nothing to do with this?

Oh, and how, exactly, do you know that he didn't mean it?

[TheoK]

He told me that he just wanted to provoke because he hated the mentality of false tolerance on the board.

[GalileoAce]

"false tolerance"?

I fail to see how his post was to provoke anything positive...

[TheoK]

This is an example of what the false tolerance on this board looks like: is this Allah?? is this how he would look?

The response to the first post in that thread would undoubtedly be the one in the third post.

That's false tolerance, especially since you at the same time treat a fellow aspie like shit because he made some really tasteless jokes.

[GalileoAce]

This is an example of what the false tolerance on this board looks like: is this Allah?? is this how he would look?

The response to the first post in that thread would undoubtedly be the one in the third post.

That's false tolerance, especially since you at the same time treat a fellow aspie like shit because he made some really tasteless jokes.

That makes no sense to me. Explain it clearer.

[renaeden]

Callaway is a big self-righteous whiner. He never meant anything he said, I know that for sure.

Soy was banned for threatening the site.

I don't see where I have whined about this.  I understand that Soy is your friend and that you brought him here so you feel you need to defend him, but still I wonder how you would feel if he had started a thread saying that your mother should have hooks in her vagina attached to nylon ropes and then be dropped off a high bridge?

I would feel nothing. I know my mum and love her to bits and his words are just letters on a computer screen. If he said it about my stepmother, though, I would tell him that I would pay to see it.

He wanted to get to you, Callaway, and he couldn't find anything on here to get to you about except for your daughter. Because that is what you mostly post about. I know more about your daughter than I do about you.