Did you watch the YouTube he linked?
I thought that was a cute and funny way to make a point.
Also, I think it's dismissive to say to someone they can't understand your argument because they belong to a different group from you and that you need to keep it simple for them, so if they respond to this a little bit sarcastically, that should be expected.
If one makes a logical argument that the group XY oppresses the group XX, then I think it's fair for a member of group XY to make a parallel argument following the same type of logic on how group XX oppresses group XY to help one see that neither is actually oppressed.
I personally agree that group XX was historically oppressed in terms of voting and property rights, but I disagree that group XX is currently oppressed in terms of orgasmic rights. I mean XYs are limited to just the one at least until the refractory period is over while we can have several in succession and I don't believe that the orgasm of either is more expected than the other. Different men are different along these lines just like different women are different.