If you're as knowledgeable as you claim, you would understand why I can relate to Michael Jackson. Study him some more if you don't understand. If you're just a liberal whore who only value people through wordly accomplishments, then fuck off because you're too shallow to understand why I'm bringing up Michael Jackson.
I think you misunderstand what "liberal" means...
# broad: showing or characterized by broad-mindedness; "a broad political stance"; "generous and broad sympathies"; "a liberal newspaper"; "tolerant ...
# having political or social views favoring reform and progress
# tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition
# a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties
# big: given or giving freely; "was a big tipper"; "the bounteous goodness of God"; "bountiful compliments"; "a freehanded host"; "a handsome allowance"; "Saturday's child is loving and giving"; "a liberal backer of the arts"; "a munificent gift"; "her fond and openhanded grandfather"
# a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets
# free: not literal; "a loose interpretation of what she had been told"; "a free translation of the poem"
I don't see cooperation between NT society and autists as possible if the ones in charge aren't autists.
Why does there have to be one in charge? What's wrong with cooperating? Working toward a common goal? There doesn't need to be one in charge. I'm disappointed you would think that way. And it's opinions such as this that do nothing to further a beneficial relationship between Autistics and NTs.
A pure aspie is someone with a different type of brain, not a damaged brain, just different. A mule has a damaged brain which resembles autism but in fact isn't autism. Most diagnosed autists are in fact mules. Many aspies are. I would estimate around 10-15% of all diagnosed aspies are true aspies, while the rest are mules.
A mule is the offspring of a male donkey and a female horse. Please use accurate terms.
On the subject of mules; donkeys and horses are similar, but have chromosomal differences. I hate to burst your bubble, but your chromosomes are the same as any other human. Same goes for all other autistics and NTs (chromosomal disorders excluded of course). Thus you "mule" analogy is erroneous. And probably fallacious.
Most diagnosed aspies have been diagnosed by psychological professionals that spent years in training in a field that you, unless I am mistaken, have not. You base this opinion on, in your own words, "intuition". That is simply not good enough. You can not declare scores of Aspies as "mules" simply because you deem them to be so. The world does not work that way.
The only aspies that should be questioned as those that self-diagnose, and even in that case it should not be done in such a bigoted negative fashion as you have demonstrated.
Your definition: "A pure aspie is someone with a different type of brain" is rather broad and covers many people who are not autistic. Not to mention the fact it's an incorrect definition. Autistic don't have a different type of a brain. They have a different brain structure, and a different brain chemistry (similar to ADHD in the latter respect). But there are other conditions in which someone might have a different brain structure.
So again... What is a "pure autist"?