How many Rolf Harris victims does it take to change a light bulb? 50. Three to do it now and then 47 to do it thirty years later when it is more profitable.
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
If somebody shoots you, you have no say in the matter.
Quote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 02:29:48 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:49:38 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:47:33 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:46:05 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide. how does that change anything? it could be made of fluff and feathers and that wouldn't change a thing. people aren't stupidYes, people are stupid. They don't think in a rational way. Why not starting with banning cars, tobacco and alcohol, if you want to save lives? Each one of them kills a hell of a lot more people than guns, but the stupid mob just believe what the politicians and the media tells them.what kind of world are you living in? cars are not designed to kill. yes they are dangerous in the wrong hands, but so are a lot of things. guns are actually designed to be lethal though. tobacco and alcohol don't kill others (yeah yeah i know passive smoking and unborn babies etc, but that's hardly the same)I don't see what the purpose means when the result is that cars kill more people than guns.
Quote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:49:38 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:47:33 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:46:05 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide. how does that change anything? it could be made of fluff and feathers and that wouldn't change a thing. people aren't stupidYes, people are stupid. They don't think in a rational way. Why not starting with banning cars, tobacco and alcohol, if you want to save lives? Each one of them kills a hell of a lot more people than guns, but the stupid mob just believe what the politicians and the media tells them.what kind of world are you living in? cars are not designed to kill. yes they are dangerous in the wrong hands, but so are a lot of things. guns are actually designed to be lethal though. tobacco and alcohol don't kill others (yeah yeah i know passive smoking and unborn babies etc, but that's hardly the same)
Quote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:47:33 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:46:05 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide. how does that change anything? it could be made of fluff and feathers and that wouldn't change a thing. people aren't stupidYes, people are stupid. They don't think in a rational way. Why not starting with banning cars, tobacco and alcohol, if you want to save lives? Each one of them kills a hell of a lot more people than guns, but the stupid mob just believe what the politicians and the media tells them.
Quote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:46:05 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide. how does that change anything? it could be made of fluff and feathers and that wouldn't change a thing. people aren't stupid
Quote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide.
being against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anything
I can do upside down chocolate moo things!
what do you guys thing the government is gonna do?why do we need to defend ourselves from the government on a day-to-day basis? if something major happened, i'm sure the people would be able to get hold of weapons. although tbh i don't see the threat. what are the government gonna do to us?
Quote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 02:31:55 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 02:29:48 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:49:38 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:47:33 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:46:05 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide. how does that change anything? it could be made of fluff and feathers and that wouldn't change a thing. people aren't stupidYes, people are stupid. They don't think in a rational way. Why not starting with banning cars, tobacco and alcohol, if you want to save lives? Each one of them kills a hell of a lot more people than guns, but the stupid mob just believe what the politicians and the media tells them.what kind of world are you living in? cars are not designed to kill. yes they are dangerous in the wrong hands, but so are a lot of things. guns are actually designed to be lethal though. tobacco and alcohol don't kill others (yeah yeah i know passive smoking and unborn babies etc, but that's hardly the same)I don't see what the purpose means when the result is that cars kill more people than guns. There are more cars in Sweden, and they are used a lot more too. So the comparision is not that valid.
Quote from: hykeaswell on August 14, 2009, 02:46:14 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 02:31:55 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 02:29:48 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:49:38 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:47:33 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:46:05 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide. how does that change anything? it could be made of fluff and feathers and that wouldn't change a thing. people aren't stupidYes, people are stupid. They don't think in a rational way. Why not starting with banning cars, tobacco and alcohol, if you want to save lives? Each one of them kills a hell of a lot more people than guns, but the stupid mob just believe what the politicians and the media tells them.what kind of world are you living in? cars are not designed to kill. yes they are dangerous in the wrong hands, but so are a lot of things. guns are actually designed to be lethal though. tobacco and alcohol don't kill others (yeah yeah i know passive smoking and unborn babies etc, but that's hardly the same)I don't see what the purpose means when the result is that cars kill more people than guns. There are more cars in Sweden, and they are used a lot more too. So the comparision is not that valid.In the US there are almost as many guns as cars and still cars kill more Americans.
People spend more time in cars than with guns in their hands. Could be a reason.And they tend to do it all at the same time, in the same place.Maybe we should ban traffic peaks.
And since we are concerned about general health here,Staircases are the most dangerous things in a house.Let's ban them too, by law. They probably are more dangerous than guns. (I, do prefer a staircase in my house over a gun btw)