It's interesting how you've gone from "a large amount of dictatorships" to "two more", Jonathan. I haven't ignored your responses; you have.
I'll quote your post from a few days back. Your original trip to la la land is highlighted:
The greater threat of terrorism is not so much a growing of idealogy. But, their ability to acquire new technology which was impossible to acquire before (have you seen the new jumbo jet? I can just picture the watering mouths of the next generation of hijackers), with the ever-increasing ability of countries to go nuclear, and the advances of science and biological warfare in government programs. This is what we must stop. This is also something that will take years to accomplish, as in order to stop this threat we must overthrow a large amount of dictatorships in order to acheive democratic stability throughout the world.
It was only after your failure to try to prove, or even acknowledge, the above, that I started hinting that you, in fact, are a moron.
As an interesting aside, Henry Kissinger seems to agree with me on how the US cannot win the war in Iraq. Apparently, he's in Japan, accepting some kind of honorary title, and reiterated his views on the Iraq war for the gathered journalists.
Okay, I posted that, I don't know what I was thinking. I was probably trying to hype up the danger that we face, as replacing only dicatatorships with the ability to produce WMD is the only type of actions that would help the war on terror.
Also, there's no way that this mis-statement was the reason for calling me a moron. You would have hit me with this long ago was that the case.
That's one screw up for me, care to explain all of yours that I have pointed out? You are like the team who is losing 42-0 then celebrates a touchdown like they won the superbowl.