Author Topic: Love me two times, baby...  (Read 2869 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 'andersom'

  • Pure Chocolate Bovine PIMP of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 39199
  • Karma: 2556
  • Gender: Female
  • well known as hyke.
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #45 on: March 28, 2009, 04:35:22 PM »
Sooo... I should have taken it as a compliment? That out of all the dregs of humanity you find around yourself, you consider this one worth interacting with?

Maybe cynical was the wrong word. I just found it funny that a guy with "there won't be another relationship" in his forum signature was attempting to flirt with me.


I live in a very realistic world. Doesn't make me cynical or a misanthrope.

Flirting is not a relationship.   Dating, (in my book is not a relationship).   Even living together (this may be a stretch for some) is only a sudo-relationship in my book, cause you can always walk.   
I guess my definition of a relationship is one where the other person can totally and utterly destroy your life due to legal entanglements...    So, I guess we need to nail down a common definition of relationship?

The only relation you can not walk from, is the one with a siamese sibling.

Spoken like a true female....

Umm, you need to talk to trigger...   he'd have a word or two to say to you.


No, I mean walk away with out leaving all your assettes (and kids) behind...  Some guys REALLY get taken to the cleaners...   I wonder how a judge would devide a gay marriages' assesstes?   "OK, who was on top most of the time?"

You know, I've been left more than two and a half years ago. There is no relation anymore. But his address is still the same as mine. He's been telling me since august 2006 that he'll be gone within tree months. He lets me take care of almost everything. Kids, income, household. There is no relation. Though, there are still legal entanglements as long as he lives with me.

I'v given him all chances to take care of finding a place. He is the one hating it here. But it's likely that I'll start an eviction procedure next month. Unless he will take the last chance given to him.

No relation left. And when I'm working, and he is at home, the kids call me if they need help. They do not ask their dad.

I don't call that a relation. Though I'm legaly still very dependant of him. If he freaks out infront of his social worker, I'll suffer too in cutting income. Even when we are divorced.



I am in a love relation since half a year, with someone I've never laid my arms around. Because of the huge distance. No legal or financial entanglements. But absolutely a relation. One with very strong other entanglements.




Side note,

In a divorce here, custody over kids is shared custody by default. Equal rights to custody for both parents. In practice this often does still mean that kids are more with one parent than with the other, because of practical reasons. But when it comes to custody, it is default. Other arrangements are exceptions.
I can do upside down chocolate moo things!

Offline driftingblizzard

  • Nuclear Prince of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 1561
  • Karma: 250
  • Gender: Male
  • I have Aspergers, what's your excuse?
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #46 on: March 29, 2009, 07:33:43 AM »
Sooo... I should have taken it as a compliment? That out of all the dregs of humanity you find around yourself, you consider this one worth interacting with?

Maybe cynical was the wrong word. I just found it funny that a guy with "there won't be another relationship" in his forum signature was attempting to flirt with me.


I live in a very realistic world. Doesn't make me cynical or a misanthrope.

Flirting is not a relationship.   Dating, (in my book is not a relationship).   Even living together (this may be a stretch for some) is only a sudo-relationship in my book, cause you can always walk.   
I guess my definition of a relationship is one where the other person can totally and utterly destroy your life due to legal entanglements...    So, I guess we need to nail down a common definition of relationship?

The only relation you can not walk from, is the one with a siamese sibling.

Spoken like a true female....

Umm, you need to talk to trigger...   he'd have a word or two to say to you.


No, I mean walk away with out leaving all your assettes (and kids) behind...  Some guys REALLY get taken to the cleaners...   I wonder how a judge would devide a gay marriages' assesstes?   "OK, who was on top most of the time?"

You know, I've been left more than two and a half years ago. There is no relation anymore. But his address is still the same as mine. He's been telling me since august 2006 that he'll be gone within tree months. He lets me take care of almost everything. Kids, income, household. There is no relation. Though, there are still legal entanglements as long as he lives with me.

I'v given him all chances to take care of finding a place. He is the one hating it here. But it's likely that I'll start an eviction procedure next month. Unless he will take the last chance given to him.

No relation left. And when I'm working, and he is at home, the kids call me if they need help. They do not ask their dad.

I don't call that a relation. Though I'm legaly still very dependant of him. If he freaks out infront of his social worker, I'll suffer too in cutting income. Even when we are divorced.



I am in a love relation since half a year, with someone I've never laid my arms around. Because of the huge distance. No legal or financial entanglements. But absolutely a relation. One with very strong other entanglements.




Side note,

In a divorce here, custody over kids is shared custody by default. Equal rights to custody for both parents. In practice this often does still mean that kids are more with one parent than with the other, because of practical reasons. But when it comes to custody, it is default. Other arrangements are exceptions.

Spoken like a dumb female...

Never lived in Virginia, huh?
« Last Edit: March 29, 2009, 07:37:15 AM by driftingblizzard »
Feeling neutral is very normal.

Offline Callaway

  • Official Spokesperson for the Aspie Elite
  • Caretaker Admin
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 29267
  • Karma: 2488
  • Gender: Female
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #47 on: March 29, 2009, 08:57:42 AM »

...

Side note,

In a divorce here, custody over kids is shared custody by default. Equal rights to custody for both parents. In practice this often does still mean that kids are more with one parent than with the other, because of practical reasons. But when it comes to custody, it is default. Other arrangements are exceptions.

Spoken like a dumb female...

Never lived in Virginia, huh?

I believe Hyke is an intelligent female who lives in the Netherlands.  She said, "in a divorce here custody over kids is shared custody by default."

In your own divorce where there was a question of custody, you gained custody of your daughter so why are you so upset about this issue?

Here is an answer from the Findlaw site regarding child custody automatically being awarded to mothers, although the actual law does vary betwen the states:

Quote from: American Bar Association Family Legal Guide
Do mothers automatically receive custody?
No. Under the laws of almost all states, mothers and fathers have an equal right to custody. Courts are not supposed to assume that a child is automatically better off with the mother or the father. Of course, judges, like the rest of us, are products of their background and personal experience. Some judges may have a deep-seated belief that mothers can take care of children better than fathers and that fathers have little experience in parenting. Conversely, some judges may believe that fathers are automatically better at raising boys--particularly older boys. Judges with such biases may apply these views when they decide custody cases, although they are supposed to base decisions on the facts of each case and not on automatic presumptions. As a group, judges are fair and unbiased in their decisions, and the level of bias is less than it was in years past. Bias on the part of individual judges can be avoided if the parents are able to decide between themselves what the custody or parenting arrangements should be.

In a contested custody case, both the father and mother have an equal burden of proving to the court that it is in the best interest of the child that the child be in his or her custody. There are a couple of states that have laws providing that if everything else is equal, the mother may be preferred; but even in those states, many fathers have been successful in obtaining custody.

In many states, judges are more likely to award custody of children to the primary caregiver, which would be the mother in many cases, but not necessarily.  I found this checklist (I don't know why changing diapers is listed twice):

Quote
When parents cannot agree on a custody arrangement, the court is left with a tough decision. The court will consider many factors when deciding to whom to award custody. In many cases, a consideration of the various factors results in an award of custody to the parent who has been the child's primary caretaker. The following checklist can help you and your attorney establish who has been the primary caretaker in your family. 

Who was usually or most often responsible for performing the following childcare responsibilities?
 
Task               Mother Father Shared
 
Feeding infant  ______ ______ ______
Feeding younger children  ______ ______ ______
Changing diapers  ______ ______ ______
Holding/cuddling  ______ ______ ______
Preparing meals  ______ ______ ______
Packing lunches  ______ ______ ______
Grocery shopping  ______ ______ ______
Changing diapers  ______ ______ ______
Dressing  ______ ______ ______
Doing laundry  ______ ______ ______
Buying clothing  ______ ______ ______
Maintaining clothing  ______ ______ ______
Bathing  ______ ______ ______
Washing hair  ______ ______ ______
Styling hair  ______ ______ ______
Brushing teeth (help with or enforce)  ______ ______ ______
Putting to bed  ______ ______ ______
Reading stories, books  ______ ______ ______
Helping with homework  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from school  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from extracurricular activities  ______ ______ ______
Conferencing with teachers  ______ ______ ______
Attending school open houses  ______ ______ ______
School volunteering  ______ ______ ______
Choosing schools  ______ ______ ______
Helping choose classes  ______ ______ ______
Attending PTA/PTO meetings  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from religious services  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from religious classes  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from sports activities  ______ ______ ______
Coaching sports teams  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from lessons  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from play dates ______ ______ ______
Arranging play dates  ______ ______ ______
Hosting play dates  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from birthday parties  ______ ______ ______
Hosting birthday parties  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for gifts for friends  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for gifts for child  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for school supplies  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for toiletries  ______ ______ ______
Taking to doctor  ______ ______ ______
Taking to dentist  ______ ______ ______
Taking to orthodontist  ______ ______ ______
Making doctor/dentist appointments  ______ ______ ______
Taking care of sick child  ______ ______ ______
Hiring babysitters  ______ ______ ______
Picking up/dropping off babysitter  ______ ______ ______
Arranging daycare  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from daycare  ______ ______ ______
Planning holidays  ______ ______ ______
Planning vacations  ______ ______ ______
Teaching values  ______ ______ ______
Teaching manners  ______ ______ ______
Monitoring chores  ______ ______ ______
Teaching sex education  ______ ______ ______
Taking to park  ______ ______ ______
Playing with indoors  ______ ______ ______
Playing with outdoors  ______ ______ ______
Cleaning home  ______ ______ ______
Maintaining home  ______ ______ ______
Other (please list):
________________________________   ______ ______ ______
________________________________   ______ ______ ______

Maybe this is why you are upset.  If a family had an arrangement where the mother was the primary caregiver and the father was not, then the mother in that family would probably be more likely to be awarded physical custody by a judge in a divorce, assuming all other factors were equal.

Offline 'andersom'

  • Pure Chocolate Bovine PIMP of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 39199
  • Karma: 2556
  • Gender: Female
  • well known as hyke.
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #48 on: March 29, 2009, 03:01:44 PM »

...

Side note,

In a divorce here, custody over kids is shared custody by default. Equal rights to custody for both parents. In practice this often does still mean that kids are more with one parent than with the other, because of practical reasons. But when it comes to custody, it is default. Other arrangements are exceptions.

Spoken like a dumb female...

Never lived in Virginia, huh?

I believe Hyke is an intelligent female who lives in the Netherlands.  She said, "in a divorce here custody over kids is shared custody by default."

In your own divorce where there was a question of custody, you gained custody of your daughter so why are you so upset about this issue?

Here is an answer from the Findlaw site regarding child custody automatically being awarded to mothers, although the actual law does vary betwen the states:

Quote from: American Bar Association Family Legal Guide
Do mothers automatically receive custody?
No. Under the laws of almost all states, mothers and fathers have an equal right to custody. Courts are not supposed to assume that a child is automatically better off with the mother or the father. Of course, judges, like the rest of us, are products of their background and personal experience. Some judges may have a deep-seated belief that mothers can take care of children better than fathers and that fathers have little experience in parenting. Conversely, some judges may believe that fathers are automatically better at raising boys--particularly older boys. Judges with such biases may apply these views when they decide custody cases, although they are supposed to base decisions on the facts of each case and not on automatic presumptions. As a group, judges are fair and unbiased in their decisions, and the level of bias is less than it was in years past. Bias on the part of individual judges can be avoided if the parents are able to decide between themselves what the custody or parenting arrangements should be.

In a contested custody case, both the father and mother have an equal burden of proving to the court that it is in the best interest of the child that the child be in his or her custody. There are a couple of states that have laws providing that if everything else is equal, the mother may be preferred; but even in those states, many fathers have been successful in obtaining custody.

In many states, judges are more likely to award custody of children to the primary caregiver, which would be the mother in many cases, but not necessarily.  I found this checklist (I don't know why changing diapers is listed twice):

Quote
When parents cannot agree on a custody arrangement, the court is left with a tough decision. The court will consider many factors when deciding to whom to award custody. In many cases, a consideration of the various factors results in an award of custody to the parent who has been the child's primary caretaker. The following checklist can help you and your attorney establish who has been the primary caretaker in your family. 

Who was usually or most often responsible for performing the following childcare responsibilities?
 
Task               Mother Father Shared
 
Feeding infant  ______ ______ ______
Feeding younger children  ______ ______ ______
Changing diapers  ______ ______ ______
Holding/cuddling  ______ ______ ______
Preparing meals  ______ ______ ______
Packing lunches  ______ ______ ______
Grocery shopping  ______ ______ ______
Changing diapers  ______ ______ ______
Dressing  ______ ______ ______
Doing laundry  ______ ______ ______
Buying clothing  ______ ______ ______
Maintaining clothing  ______ ______ ______
Bathing  ______ ______ ______
Washing hair  ______ ______ ______
Styling hair  ______ ______ ______
Brushing teeth (help with or enforce)  ______ ______ ______
Putting to bed  ______ ______ ______
Reading stories, books  ______ ______ ______
Helping with homework  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from school  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from extracurricular activities  ______ ______ ______
Conferencing with teachers  ______ ______ ______
Attending school open houses  ______ ______ ______
School volunteering  ______ ______ ______
Choosing schools  ______ ______ ______
Helping choose classes  ______ ______ ______
Attending PTA/PTO meetings  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from religious services  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from religious classes  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from sports activities  ______ ______ ______
Coaching sports teams  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from lessons  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from play dates ______ ______ ______
Arranging play dates  ______ ______ ______
Hosting play dates  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from birthday parties  ______ ______ ______
Hosting birthday parties  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for gifts for friends  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for gifts for child  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for school supplies  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for toiletries  ______ ______ ______
Taking to doctor  ______ ______ ______
Taking to dentist  ______ ______ ______
Taking to orthodontist  ______ ______ ______
Making doctor/dentist appointments  ______ ______ ______
Taking care of sick child  ______ ______ ______
Hiring babysitters  ______ ______ ______
Picking up/dropping off babysitter  ______ ______ ______
Arranging daycare  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from daycare  ______ ______ ______
Planning holidays  ______ ______ ______
Planning vacations  ______ ______ ______
Teaching values  ______ ______ ______
Teaching manners  ______ ______ ______
Monitoring chores  ______ ______ ______
Teaching sex education  ______ ______ ______
Taking to park  ______ ______ ______
Playing with indoors  ______ ______ ______
Playing with outdoors  ______ ______ ______
Cleaning home  ______ ______ ______
Maintaining home  ______ ______ ______
Other (please list):
________________________________   ______ ______ ______
________________________________   ______ ______ ______

Maybe this is why you are upset.  If a family had an arrangement where the mother was the primary caregiver and the father was not, then the mother in that family would probably be more likely to be awarded physical custody by a judge in a divorce, assuming all other factors were equal.

Thank you Callaway.

Here is the Netherlands indeed. There is a difference in custody and caretaking. Custody is shared by default, unless there are strong reasons to act differently. Like abuse. Caretaking, well, more and more co-parenting is happening, possible if parents still both live in a reasonable distance from the school of the kids. In that case children spend half of their time with each parent. For the rest, yes, more kids end up having more time with their mothers than with their fathers. Because of practicalities. Dads having bigger jobs etc. Not fair. I agree. But it still happens. From 12 years on children have their own say in where they want to be, with their dad or with their mum.
And I've seen awful behaviour, both of dads and mums, to get the kids with them. Mudslinging, false accusations, bribing of kids. But most of the time it goes OK. And lots of couples that split up hire just one lawyer, representing both parties.

My ex and I were/are aiming at co-parenting. But the way my ex is now, that's not an option. He admits that himself too. Maybe he'll be more stable, once he lives on his own for a while. I sure hope so. For the kids and for him.

And about 'dumb female'. Since it is coming from you DriftingBlizzard, I take it as coming from you. Suspecting you think that of almost all women, by default.  ;D
I can do upside down chocolate moo things!

Offline driftingblizzard

  • Nuclear Prince of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 1561
  • Karma: 250
  • Gender: Male
  • I have Aspergers, what's your excuse?
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #49 on: March 30, 2009, 03:21:17 PM »

...

Side note,

In a divorce here, custody over kids is shared custody by default. Equal rights to custody for both parents. In practice this often does still mean that kids are more with one parent than with the other, because of practical reasons. But when it comes to custody, it is default. Other arrangements are exceptions.

Spoken like a dumb female...

Never lived in Virginia, huh?

I believe Hyke is an intelligent female who lives in the Netherlands.  She said, "in a divorce here custody over kids is shared custody by default."

In your own divorce where there was a question of custody, you gained custody of your daughter so why are you so upset about this issue?

Here is an answer from the Findlaw site regarding child custody automatically being awarded to mothers, although the actual law does vary betwen the states:

Quote from: American Bar Association Family Legal Guide
Do mothers automatically receive custody?
No. Under the laws of almost all states, mothers and fathers have an equal right to custody. Courts are not supposed to assume that a child is automatically better off with the mother or the father. Of course, judges, like the rest of us, are products of their background and personal experience. Some judges may have a deep-seated belief that mothers can take care of children better than fathers and that fathers have little experience in parenting. Conversely, some judges may believe that fathers are automatically better at raising boys--particularly older boys. Judges with such biases may apply these views when they decide custody cases, although they are supposed to base decisions on the facts of each case and not on automatic presumptions. As a group, judges are fair and unbiased in their decisions, and the level of bias is less than it was in years past. Bias on the part of individual judges can be avoided if the parents are able to decide between themselves what the custody or parenting arrangements should be.

In a contested custody case, both the father and mother have an equal burden of proving to the court that it is in the best interest of the child that the child be in his or her custody. There are a couple of states that have laws providing that if everything else is equal, the mother may be preferred; but even in those states, many fathers have been successful in obtaining custody.

In many states, judges are more likely to award custody of children to the primary caregiver, which would be the mother in many cases, but not necessarily.  I found this checklist (I don't know why changing diapers is listed twice):

Quote
When parents cannot agree on a custody arrangement, the court is left with a tough decision. The court will consider many factors when deciding to whom to award custody. In many cases, a consideration of the various factors results in an award of custody to the parent who has been the child's primary caretaker. The following checklist can help you and your attorney establish who has been the primary caretaker in your family. 

Who was usually or most often responsible for performing the following childcare responsibilities?
 
Task               Mother Father Shared
 
Feeding infant  ______ ______ ______
Feeding younger children  ______ ______ ______
Changing diapers  ______ ______ ______
Holding/cuddling  ______ ______ ______
Preparing meals  ______ ______ ______
Packing lunches  ______ ______ ______
Grocery shopping  ______ ______ ______
Changing diapers  ______ ______ ______
Dressing  ______ ______ ______
Doing laundry  ______ ______ ______
Buying clothing  ______ ______ ______
Maintaining clothing  ______ ______ ______
Bathing  ______ ______ ______
Washing hair  ______ ______ ______
Styling hair  ______ ______ ______
Brushing teeth (help with or enforce)  ______ ______ ______
Putting to bed  ______ ______ ______
Reading stories, books  ______ ______ ______
Helping with homework  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from school  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from extracurricular activities  ______ ______ ______
Conferencing with teachers  ______ ______ ______
Attending school open houses  ______ ______ ______
School volunteering  ______ ______ ______
Choosing schools  ______ ______ ______
Helping choose classes  ______ ______ ______
Attending PTA/PTO meetings  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from religious services  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from religious classes  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from sports activities  ______ ______ ______
Coaching sports teams  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from lessons  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from play dates ______ ______ ______
Arranging play dates  ______ ______ ______
Hosting play dates  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from birthday parties  ______ ______ ______
Hosting birthday parties  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for gifts for friends  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for gifts for child  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for school supplies  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for toiletries  ______ ______ ______
Taking to doctor  ______ ______ ______
Taking to dentist  ______ ______ ______
Taking to orthodontist  ______ ______ ______
Making doctor/dentist appointments  ______ ______ ______
Taking care of sick child  ______ ______ ______
Hiring babysitters  ______ ______ ______
Picking up/dropping off babysitter  ______ ______ ______
Arranging daycare  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from daycare  ______ ______ ______
Planning holidays  ______ ______ ______
Planning vacations  ______ ______ ______
Teaching values  ______ ______ ______
Teaching manners  ______ ______ ______
Monitoring chores  ______ ______ ______
Teaching sex education  ______ ______ ______
Taking to park  ______ ______ ______
Playing with indoors  ______ ______ ______
Playing with outdoors  ______ ______ ______
Cleaning home  ______ ______ ______
Maintaining home  ______ ______ ______
Other (please list):
________________________________   ______ ______ ______
________________________________   ______ ______ ______

Maybe this is why you are upset.  If a family had an arrangement where the mother was the primary caregiver and the father was not, then the mother in that family would probably be more likely to be awarded physical custody by a judge in a divorce, assuming all other factors were equal.

Thank you Callaway.

Here is the Netherlands indeed. There is a difference in custody and caretaking. Custody is shared by default, unless there are strong reasons to act differently. Like abuse. Caretaking, well, more and more co-parenting is happening, possible if parents still both live in a reasonable distance from the school of the kids. In that case children spend half of their time with each parent. For the rest, yes, more kids end up having more time with their mothers than with their fathers. Because of practicalities. Dads having bigger jobs etc. Not fair. I agree. But it still happens. From 12 years on children have their own say in where they want to be, with their dad or with their mum.
And I've seen awful behaviour, both of dads and mums, to get the kids with them. Mudslinging, false accusations, bribing of kids. But most of the time it goes OK. And lots of couples that split up hire just one lawyer, representing both parties.

My ex and I were/are aiming at co-parenting. But the way my ex is now, that's not an option. He admits that himself too. Maybe he'll be more stable, once he lives on his own for a while. I sure hope so. For the kids and for him.

And about 'dumb female'. Since it is coming from you DriftingBlizzard, I take it as coming from you. Suspecting you think that of almost all women, by default.  ;D

I offer my sincerest appologies to everyone but Hykeswell.   I didn't mean for that comment to be taken as an insult to anyone but her.  She said something, no matter where she is from as if it is a truth everywhere.  That's why I said its a dumb comment. And she is female.   

And for her to infer that I meant every woman was dumb is just Biggotted and sexist.  Its like if I said, 'there goes a green car"  she was inferring that I thought all cars were green.  nope, just her's.  And anyone is welcome to come to her defense, but I stand by my comment.  In the known galaxay, women have by far ended up with the kids more often that not.  Its the default judgement especially in tough cases.  The tie usually goes to the woman. period. 

So now, I guess I have to award her with the second serving of that's another dumb comment.  See bolding above.
Feeling neutral is very normal.

Offline 'andersom'

  • Pure Chocolate Bovine PIMP of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 39199
  • Karma: 2556
  • Gender: Female
  • well known as hyke.
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #50 on: March 30, 2009, 04:11:19 PM »

...

Side note,

In a divorce here, custody over kids is shared custody by default. Equal rights to custody for both parents. In practice this often does still mean that kids are more with one parent than with the other, because of practical reasons. But when it comes to custody, it is default. Other arrangements are exceptions.

Spoken like a dumb female...

Never lived in Virginia, huh?

I believe Hyke is an intelligent female who lives in the Netherlands.  She said, "in a divorce here custody over kids is shared custody by default."

In your own divorce where there was a question of custody, you gained custody of your daughter so why are you so upset about this issue?

Here is an answer from the Findlaw site regarding child custody automatically being awarded to mothers, although the actual law does vary betwen the states:

Quote from: American Bar Association Family Legal Guide
Do mothers automatically receive custody?
No. Under the laws of almost all states, mothers and fathers have an equal right to custody. Courts are not supposed to assume that a child is automatically better off with the mother or the father. Of course, judges, like the rest of us, are products of their background and personal experience. Some judges may have a deep-seated belief that mothers can take care of children better than fathers and that fathers have little experience in parenting. Conversely, some judges may believe that fathers are automatically better at raising boys--particularly older boys. Judges with such biases may apply these views when they decide custody cases, although they are supposed to base decisions on the facts of each case and not on automatic presumptions. As a group, judges are fair and unbiased in their decisions, and the level of bias is less than it was in years past. Bias on the part of individual judges can be avoided if the parents are able to decide between themselves what the custody or parenting arrangements should be.

In a contested custody case, both the father and mother have an equal burden of proving to the court that it is in the best interest of the child that the child be in his or her custody. There are a couple of states that have laws providing that if everything else is equal, the mother may be preferred; but even in those states, many fathers have been successful in obtaining custody.

In many states, judges are more likely to award custody of children to the primary caregiver, which would be the mother in many cases, but not necessarily.  I found this checklist (I don't know why changing diapers is listed twice):

Quote
When parents cannot agree on a custody arrangement, the court is left with a tough decision. The court will consider many factors when deciding to whom to award custody. In many cases, a consideration of the various factors results in an award of custody to the parent who has been the child's primary caretaker. The following checklist can help you and your attorney establish who has been the primary caretaker in your family. 

Who was usually or most often responsible for performing the following childcare responsibilities?
 
Task               Mother Father Shared
 
Feeding infant  ______ ______ ______
Feeding younger children  ______ ______ ______
Changing diapers  ______ ______ ______
Holding/cuddling  ______ ______ ______
Preparing meals  ______ ______ ______
Packing lunches  ______ ______ ______
Grocery shopping  ______ ______ ______
Changing diapers  ______ ______ ______
Dressing  ______ ______ ______
Doing laundry  ______ ______ ______
Buying clothing  ______ ______ ______
Maintaining clothing  ______ ______ ______
Bathing  ______ ______ ______
Washing hair  ______ ______ ______
Styling hair  ______ ______ ______
Brushing teeth (help with or enforce)  ______ ______ ______
Putting to bed  ______ ______ ______
Reading stories, books  ______ ______ ______
Helping with homework  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from school  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from extracurricular activities  ______ ______ ______
Conferencing with teachers  ______ ______ ______
Attending school open houses  ______ ______ ______
School volunteering  ______ ______ ______
Choosing schools  ______ ______ ______
Helping choose classes  ______ ______ ______
Attending PTA/PTO meetings  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from religious services  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from religious classes  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from sports activities  ______ ______ ______
Coaching sports teams  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from lessons  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from play dates ______ ______ ______
Arranging play dates  ______ ______ ______
Hosting play dates  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from birthday parties  ______ ______ ______
Hosting birthday parties  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for gifts for friends  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for gifts for child  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for school supplies  ______ ______ ______
Shopping for toiletries  ______ ______ ______
Taking to doctor  ______ ______ ______
Taking to dentist  ______ ______ ______
Taking to orthodontist  ______ ______ ______
Making doctor/dentist appointments  ______ ______ ______
Taking care of sick child  ______ ______ ______
Hiring babysitters  ______ ______ ______
Picking up/dropping off babysitter  ______ ______ ______
Arranging daycare  ______ ______ ______
Taking to/picking up from daycare  ______ ______ ______
Planning holidays  ______ ______ ______
Planning vacations  ______ ______ ______
Teaching values  ______ ______ ______
Teaching manners  ______ ______ ______
Monitoring chores  ______ ______ ______
Teaching sex education  ______ ______ ______
Taking to park  ______ ______ ______
Playing with indoors  ______ ______ ______
Playing with outdoors  ______ ______ ______
Cleaning home  ______ ______ ______
Maintaining home  ______ ______ ______
Other (please list):
________________________________   ______ ______ ______
________________________________   ______ ______ ______

Maybe this is why you are upset.  If a family had an arrangement where the mother was the primary caregiver and the father was not, then the mother in that family would probably be more likely to be awarded physical custody by a judge in a divorce, assuming all other factors were equal.

Thank you Callaway.

Here is the Netherlands indeed. There is a difference in custody and caretaking. Custody is shared by default, unless there are strong reasons to act differently. Like abuse. Caretaking, well, more and more co-parenting is happening, possible if parents still both live in a reasonable distance from the school of the kids. In that case children spend half of their time with each parent. For the rest, yes, more kids end up having more time with their mothers than with their fathers. Because of practicalities. Dads having bigger jobs etc. Not fair. I agree. But it still happens. From 12 years on children have their own say in where they want to be, with their dad or with their mum.
And I've seen awful behaviour, both of dads and mums, to get the kids with them. Mudslinging, false accusations, bribing of kids. But most of the time it goes OK. And lots of couples that split up hire just one lawyer, representing both parties.

My ex and I were/are aiming at co-parenting. But the way my ex is now, that's not an option. He admits that himself too. Maybe he'll be more stable, once he lives on his own for a while. I sure hope so. For the kids and for him.

And about 'dumb female'. Since it is coming from you DriftingBlizzard, I take it as coming from you. Suspecting you think that of almost all women, by default.  ;D

I offer my sincerest appologies to everyone but Hykeswell.   I didn't mean for that comment to be taken as an insult to anyone but her.  She said something, no matter where she is from as if it is a truth everywhere.  That's why I said its a dumb comment. And she is female.   

And for her to infer that I meant every woman was dumb is just Biggotted and sexist.  Its like if I said, 'there goes a green car"  she was inferring that I thought all cars were green.  nope, just her's.  And anyone is welcome to come to her defense, but I stand by my comment.  In the known galaxay, women have by far ended up with the kids more often that not.  Its the default judgement especially in tough cases.  The tie usually goes to the woman. period. 

So now, I guess I have to award her with the second serving of that's another dumb comment.  See bolding above.

I still think the only relation you cannot walk out, is the one with a siamese sibling.
But that does not mean that walking out of relations is easy.

I reacted on your post, because you made it as if any relation was easy to walk out, except the one with legal entanglements. That I do wholeheartedly disagree with. There are many ways to be entangled in a relation. Not only legal. And all can be hard to end. And even when all entanglements have ended, still responsibility, loyalty and practical reasons can make it hard to walk out of something that is no relation anymore.

Further I am well aware that women do often end up with the kids. And I do think that that is a major injustice. When a couple breaks up, it's the couple that breaks up. And denying the kids to see their dad, it is mostly the dad that suffers from a treatment like that, is denying children to see half of their origin. Raising kids while slandering the other parent, happening both ways a lot , is slandering half of the kids themselves. Then their origin is slandered. As if they are only loved for half of who they are. Very unfair.

Kids have a right to both parents, if possible. It is sad, and cruel, when a parent is not allowed to see his kids. Sadder even more when he or she does not want to see the kids anymore. Because the child can not even dream of it happening one day then.

The joint custody by default is not that old here in the Netherlands in legislation. But I'm glad it's there. It is a step in the right direction I think.
I can do upside down chocolate moo things!

Offline 'andersom'

  • Pure Chocolate Bovine PIMP of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 39199
  • Karma: 2556
  • Gender: Female
  • well known as hyke.
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #51 on: March 31, 2009, 02:26:03 PM »
Oh, DB, I do take back the 'by default' in my remark about you. That was mean. Crappy mood sometimes lately.
I can do upside down chocolate moo things!

Offline zer0

  • Constant Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
  • Karma: 64
  • Gender: Male
  • The Great Korvhund-o
    • Bento & Starchky dot com
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #52 on: April 01, 2009, 11:26:27 AM »
are you sure you like niggers
Den som läser detta är dum.

Offline zer0

  • Constant Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
  • Karma: 64
  • Gender: Male
  • The Great Korvhund-o
    • Bento & Starchky dot com
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #53 on: April 01, 2009, 11:26:56 AM »
AIDS
Den som läser detta är dum.

Offline zer0

  • Constant Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
  • Karma: 64
  • Gender: Male
  • The Great Korvhund-o
    • Bento & Starchky dot com
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #54 on: April 01, 2009, 11:27:38 AM »
ARE YOU SURE YOU LIKE NIGGER
Den som läser detta är dum.

Offline zer0

  • Constant Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
  • Karma: 64
  • Gender: Male
  • The Great Korvhund-o
    • Bento & Starchky dot com
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #55 on: April 01, 2009, 11:28:06 AM »
AIDS
Den som läser detta är dum.

Offline zer0

  • Constant Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
  • Karma: 64
  • Gender: Male
  • The Great Korvhund-o
    • Bento & Starchky dot com
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #56 on: April 01, 2009, 11:28:37 AM »
AIDS
Den som läser detta är dum.

Offline zer0

  • Constant Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
  • Karma: 64
  • Gender: Male
  • The Great Korvhund-o
    • Bento & Starchky dot com
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #57 on: April 01, 2009, 11:29:04 AM »
AIDS
Den som läser detta är dum.

TheoK

  • Guest
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #58 on: April 01, 2009, 11:29:16 AM »
 :plus:

Offline zer0

  • Constant Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
  • Karma: 64
  • Gender: Male
  • The Great Korvhund-o
    • Bento & Starchky dot com
Re: Love me two times, baby...
« Reply #59 on: April 01, 2009, 12:19:24 PM »
JAG SKA NIGGRA DEJ INUTI HITLER DITT JÄVLA HITLERNIGG
Den som läser detta är dum.