From a Swedish board;
Redibo asks: "I would also very much like to know what you have against the police ... And you still have not answered why you believe you should have the right, or why you need, to carry weapons in town?" (This idiot hasn't understood anything.)
Litengris answers: "I have something against people who tell me that I cannot do certain things and then do just these things themselves. It is quite funny when a person dressed in dark blue uniform and has a gun and a baton around their waist and a ridiculous hat on the head turns up and says, 'You shall not bear arms. They are dangerous.' I mean, how the hell should I be able to take such a person seriously? Allow me to laugh over that nonsense. Haha :-)
When you use the word 'needs' to justify that people should not be allowed to carry weapons in town, it might mean anything. If you're saying that Axel does not have 'needs' but Johan has, it does not say very much actually. Axel might get a hardon by carrying, or perhaps he feels threatened by neighbours or so. It is impossible for you to say just why.
So don't come and say that Per but not Adolf needs just because you have said it. They may say the same about you."
If you don't think that the "state" is God or something, it's very surprising how people honestly can't understand that the state has its "rights" by brute force and nothing else and that it's as criminal as the mafia or even worse.