I have always wondered this. "Liber" is Latin and means "free". Thus "liberal" implicates that a person would be freedom-loving. However, I have never found this to be the case.
In the film "Der blaue Engel" from 1930, the colleagues of the Professor give the singer Lola a brief and cynical lesson in politics. One of the statements is "The Peoples' Party is against the people". The Peoples' Party in Gemany in 1930 was a so called liberal party, just like the Swedish "liberal" party, which actually calls itself "Peoples' Party the Liberals".
Even with the knowledge that European "liberal" parties claim to be
socialliberal to a much greater extent than in the USA, I still see little or no freedom connected with the term.
Checklist; are the "liberals" for:
* liberal gunlaws? No. If they have an opinon about it, it is for
harsher gun laws.
* liberal drug laws? Not in Europe at least and not to any greater extent in the USA either.
* lower taxes? Not considerably, except, maybe, for those who already have low taxes.
* war against dictatorships? No.
So what
are the "liberals" for? Free immigration, that is, as long as they think that a majority wants that. When the Swedish "liberal" party to their surprise discovered that a majority of the people did
not want every towelhead on the planet to move to Sweden, they demanded tests for immigrants on knowledge of the Swedish language.
They also voted for the so called
FRA law on the 18th of june this year.
That's the "liberal" view on freedom.